1947
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-194701000-00029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…110 It was submitted that tuition fee increases constituted a retrogressive measure and would discriminate against students from disadvantaged backgrounds because they were the most debt-averse of potential university attendees. 111 The High Court rejected the claimants' submissions and upheld the Government's regulations. Lord Justice Elias suggested that whilst the ICESCR could be considered in relation to A2P1, it was not binding and under the ECHR states had a wide margin of appreciation in relation to charging fees at university level.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Rights As Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…110 It was submitted that tuition fee increases constituted a retrogressive measure and would discriminate against students from disadvantaged backgrounds because they were the most debt-averse of potential university attendees. 111 The High Court rejected the claimants' submissions and upheld the Government's regulations. Lord Justice Elias suggested that whilst the ICESCR could be considered in relation to A2P1, it was not binding and under the ECHR states had a wide margin of appreciation in relation to charging fees at university level.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Rights As Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[p]eople have not understood that this was a speculation'. 117 If the government is going to criminalise incivilities such as begging, on the basis of broken windows, it should prove that there is a credible nexus between disorder and crime. My analysis of the available literature suggests that there is clearly no empirical evidence to support the broken windows thesis.…”
Section: Contemporary Justifications For Maintaining the Offence Of Bmentioning
confidence: 99%