Regional Clustering in the Digital Economy

Charykova, O.G.; Markova, E.S.

doi:10.17059/2019-2-8

Cited by 19 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The factors and conditions that affect the digital transformation of infrastructural provision for agricultural production have been identified [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. It is necessary to account them for the development of priority guidelines for the intensification of digitalization processes within the enterprises of the agro-industrial complex.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalization of Infrastructural Provision for Agricultural Production

Charykova¹,

Narolina²,

Otinova³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the Russian Conference on Digital Economy and Knowledge Management (RuDEcK 2020)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The subject of the study is the organizational and economic relations that arise in the process of digitalization of infrastructural provision for agricultural production. The aim of the work is the formation of theoretical and methodological provisions for the development of digitalization of infrastructural provision for agricultural production. The article shows the importance of digitalization of infrastructural provision of agricultural production, which can significantly increase the efficiency, quality and productivity of production processes in comparison with traditional forms of management. The general and particular problems concerning the digitalization of both the agro-industrial complex on the whole and the infrastructure objects of agro-industrial production are identified in the article. The importance and the practicability of the digital transformation of agricultural production have been substantiated as the result of the study. The theoretical provisions that reveal the essence and the content of the infrastructural provision for the agro-industrial complex are formulated in the article. The methodical approach to the analysis of the digitalization status of the infrastructural provision of agro-industrial production is substantiated, including the stages of the conduct and the main indicators. The conditions and the factors affecting the digitalization in the agricultural sector both positive and negative are identified. The priority guidelines for the digital transformation of the agricultural production infrastructure have been developed based on the identified problems. The article proposes to consider the infrastructure of agricultural production as a system of elements, institutions and mechanisms that contribute to the production, conservation, physical movement of agricultural products. Digitalization is viewed as the transformation of production and management models based on innovative digital technologies. The application of the proposed methodological approach to assessing the digitalization of infrastructural facilities allows analyzing the degree of use of digital technologies in agricultural enterprises and justifying the need for the introduction of new digital technologies in infrastructural facilities. The practical relevance of the digitalization of infrastructural provision for agroindustrial production is the contribution to the growth of production volumes, the reduction of transaction costs, the increase of physical and economic affordability of food, the promotion of import substitution and the development of interregional exchange and export.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalization of Infrastructural Provision for Agricultural Production

Charykova¹,

Narolina²,

Otinova³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the Russian Conference on Digital Economy and Knowledge Management (RuDEcK 2020)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The sub-regional level is determined by economic relations and interactions within the same region. In other words, a sub-regional system is understood as an ordered set of objects of economic, investment, social and other activities of municipalities that are part of a particular subject of the Federation and characterized by the joint use of territorial resources to achieve the interests of all its participants [6].…”

Section: Assessment Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Subregional Development as the Basis of Economic Growth of Russia

Markova¹,

Zageeva²

2020

Proceedings of the Russian Conference on Digital Economy and Knowledge Management (RuDEcK 2020)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The subject of the research is the tools of subregional development that are implemented in the Lipetsk region and ensuring its investment potential. The purpose of the work is to show the practical importance of sub-regional development for ensuring high rates of economic growth in the conditions of digitalization of the economy. The following tasks are solved: determined the factors of economic growth in conditions of digitalization of the economy; suggested a classification of the forms of subregional development; presented a system of subregional instruments implemented in the Lipetsk region; analyzed the functioning of special economic zones, clusters and private industrial parks. It is proposed to consider sub-regional systems as a set of objects of various activities of municipalities located on the territory of a particular subject of the Federation with the joint use of total territorial resources both to maximize the overall effect of these objects, and to achieve the private interests of each participant in the sub-regional system, ordered in a certain way. This approach makes it possible to create a multi-level system of regional development tools aimed at ensuring economic growth through the most optimal use of territorial resources. Building a three-level sub-regional system allows the region to expand the "funnel" of attracted investments, form "growth points", and improve the economic and social impact of projects implemented in a particular territory.

show abstract

“…As an improvement in the methodology for analyzing the region's cluster development, it is suggested to use the difference in differences (DiD) method, which makes it possible to assess the clustering effect as the difference between the results before and after the formation of the cluster. This will allow cluster interactions to be managed using a virtual business environment as an organizational platform with a multidimensional network architecture (Charykova & Markova, 2019). The analysis of scientific works showed that, despite the relevance of the topic under study, the problem of transforming the social sphere due to the digital economy development has not been sufficiently studied.…”

Section: Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%