Regional Development and the Production of Space: The Role of Infrastructure in the Attraction of New Inward Investment

Abstract

The continuous renewal and improvement of infrastructure within Europe are widely regarded as a very necessary part of any regional development strategy, particularly in regions which are economically and geographically peripheral to the core industrialised regions. This paper is a review of some of the problems associated with modelling the relationship between improvements in infrastructure and regional economic growth specifically in the context of the attraction of new inward investment. An illustration from northeast England is used to argue that it is increasingly untenable to regard infrastructure as an independent variable influencing the regional distribution of mobile investment. Although the presence of certain basic infrastructure may be significant in attracting the initial interest of potential new investors, success in winning inward investment projects depends increasingly upon the ability of public authorities to produce spaces which are customised to the changing needs of key firms. This process of infrastructure modification and adaptation challenges simplistic interpretations of the role of infrastructure in regional economic development. Examples demonstrate how inward investment projects can be levered into a region by means of a variety of incentives including promises of rapid infrastructure modifications. The experience of Nissan is used to illustrate how an investor can subsequently engage directly in the production of its own customised space through the control exercised over regional authorities. It is concluded that this area of research and policy formation would benefit from insights into the political processes which occur at local levels in the modification and production of space.

Air Transportation and Regional Growth: Which Way Does the Causality Run?

“…Accordingly, poor transportation infrastructure may limit the growth potential of the local economy (Peck, 1996;Vickerman, 1996).…”

Technology Parks and Regional Development in the Southern European Periphery

“…How ever, Hughes is still in its expansion phase and there are other firms committed to locating on the Park, partly because it offers opportunities for them to subsidize the physical development process and to produce a customized space dedicated to their requirements as has been observed in the context of recent inward investments in the UK (Peck 1996). The development process is highly dependent for the production of its knowledgebase on wider corporate networks outside the region.…”

Extending Economic Boundaries and Exporting Expertise: New Evidence on Singapore's Gambit in Indonesia, Vietnam and India

“…The eclectic paradigm was used to explain the ability and willingness of firms to serve markets, and to look into the reasons for their choice of exploiting this advantage through foreign production rather than domestic production, exports or portfolio resource flows through the interaction of ownership-specific advantages, internalization-incentive advantages, and location-specific advantages (OLI). This theory has been extended, in more recent literature, to deliberations on the role of infrastructure in the attraction of new investments (Peck, 1996); the presence of immobile clusters of Downloaded by [Gebze Yuksek Teknoloji Enstitïsu ] at 01:40 20 December 2014 complementary value-added activities (Markusen, 1996), the transactional benefits of spatial proximity (Porter, 1996) and the business-government nexus in alliance capitalism (Dunning 1995(Dunning , 1997Evans, 1995;Dunning & Narula, 1996.…”