2002
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.51.3.718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Differences in the Response of Human Pre-Adipocytes to PPARγ and RXRα Agonists

Abstract: We have previously reported that omental (OM) preadipocytes respond less well to the prodifferentiating effects of thiazolidinediones than do preadipocytes from subcutaneous (SC) depots. This finding is consistent with in vivo alterations in fat distribution that occur in humans treated with thiazolidinediones. To explore these site-related differences further, we used real-time RT-PCR to quantify the specific mRNAs encoding peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) ␥1 and ␥2 and found that both isofor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…After 15 d of exposure to serum-free differentiation medium, the expression of the key adipogenic transcription factors PPARγ2 and C/EBPα was greater in abdominal than femoral preadipocytes. The importance of PPARγ2 for adipogenesis is well established (29,30), and PPARγ is positively associated with fat-cell size in mice (31) and with obesity in humans (29). Inherent differences in fat-cell hyperplasia and, potentially, in the production of mediators that recruit new fat-cell development may, together with differences in circulation, nutrient supply, innervation, or local hormonal and paracrine factors, contribute to the distinct responses of different fat depots to high caloric intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 15 d of exposure to serum-free differentiation medium, the expression of the key adipogenic transcription factors PPARγ2 and C/EBPα was greater in abdominal than femoral preadipocytes. The importance of PPARγ2 for adipogenesis is well established (29,30), and PPARγ is positively associated with fat-cell size in mice (31) and with obesity in humans (29). Inherent differences in fat-cell hyperplasia and, potentially, in the production of mediators that recruit new fat-cell development may, together with differences in circulation, nutrient supply, innervation, or local hormonal and paracrine factors, contribute to the distinct responses of different fat depots to high caloric intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 -HSD1 -/-mice had higher adipose PPAR mRNA levels in their fat. Since PPAR ligands cause insulin sensitisation and fat M a n u s c r i p t 11 redistribution to the periphery (Kelly et al, 1999, Sewter et al, 2002, a mechanism for the beneficial fat redistribution was suggested, on the assumption that increased circulating free fatty acids during high fat feeding were acting as endogenous ligands for the PPAR receptors . In agreement with both increased PPAR and reduced glucocorticoid action, insulin sensitisation is evident in isolated primary 11 -HSD1 -/-adipocytes which showed increased basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake.…”
Section: -Hsd1 Deficient (-Hsd1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schoonjans et al [14] pointed out that RXR/PPAR was combined with a specific sequence DR in promoter region of LPL gene and could promote the expression of LPL. The RXR ligand LG100268 acted together with PPAR agonists rosiglitazone to promote subcutaneous adipose differentiation of human [15]. In metabolism, it was known that many nuclear receptor-mediated pathways in fatty acid oxidation and lipid metabolism were disordered for the lack of RXR [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%