2021
DOI: 10.1002/rse2.223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional evaluation of satellite‐based methods for identifying end of vegetation growing season

Abstract: Autumn phenology plays an important role in regulating ecosystem carbon and water cycling, but it has received less attention than spring phenology. Satellitebased methods have been widely applied in monitoring autumn phenology at large spatial scales. However, few studies have evaluated and compared the performance of different satellite-based methods in autumn phenology identification. Here, we compared the spatiotemporal variations of end of vegetation growing season dates (EOS) as determined from eight pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such patterns have also been documented in Tibetan alpine grassland, where MODIS Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data captured the advancement of SOS throughout 2000-2014, but a delaying trend of the GIMMS NDVI estimated SOS was observed [39]. Discrepancies between phenology trends based on different denoising methods or extraction methods varied in research areas, research periods, and vegetation types [40][41][42][43]. For example, Zhu et al [8] applied several commonly utilized vegetation phenology extraction methods on MOD09A1 (8-day) and MOD13A2 (16-day) datasets and found no significant differences between SOS or EOS trends derived from asymmetric Gaussian function, double logistic function, and the piecewise logistic function method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Such patterns have also been documented in Tibetan alpine grassland, where MODIS Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data captured the advancement of SOS throughout 2000-2014, but a delaying trend of the GIMMS NDVI estimated SOS was observed [39]. Discrepancies between phenology trends based on different denoising methods or extraction methods varied in research areas, research periods, and vegetation types [40][41][42][43]. For example, Zhu et al [8] applied several commonly utilized vegetation phenology extraction methods on MOD09A1 (8-day) and MOD13A2 (16-day) datasets and found no significant differences between SOS or EOS trends derived from asymmetric Gaussian function, double logistic function, and the piecewise logistic function method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Consequently, observations in these datasets are often missing or contaminated [7]. In addition, these datasets are acquired relatively infrequently compared to low spatial resolution datasets, generally limiting their ability to capture key vegetation phenological phases [8]. Numerous studies have been attempting to develop methods for reproducing NDVI time-series images with both high spatial and temporal resolutions, which can be mainly divided into the temporal interpolation methods and the spatiotemporal fusion methods [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing studies used remote‐sensing data to study the beginning and termination of the growing season. Remote sensing evidently provides important and practical tools in broad‐scale vegetation studies (Babst et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2021). However, the major drawback of using remote‐sensing data is the so‐called ‘scale issue’ (Wu & Li, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%