2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13132-015-0296-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Foresight for Bridging National Science, Technology, and Innovation with Company Innovation: Experiences from Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the published sources [22,23], the researchers during their foresight studies did not take into Table 1: Consumption and production of basic agrofood products in the non-Chernozem zone of the region over time, thousand tons. account the key factors and parameters reflecting the work of agricultural sector at the regional level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the published sources [22,23], the researchers during their foresight studies did not take into Table 1: Consumption and production of basic agrofood products in the non-Chernozem zone of the region over time, thousand tons. account the key factors and parameters reflecting the work of agricultural sector at the regional level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A preforesight project was organized in the Republic of Sakha. In the Republic of Bashkortostan the formation of a foresight project in 2005 was primarily associated with the choice of innovative priorities and the development of a strategy for innovative development of the region [22][23][24]. e main work methods were critical technologies in combination with SWOT analysis, as well as focus groups formation and expert survey [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning these critical areas of research, there has been work that has focused on Russia (e.g. Alnafrah and Mouselli 2017;Gershman and Kitova 2017; Golichenko and Malkova 2017;Kindras et al 2015), and this conceptual paper attempts to reconsider understandings of knowledge exchange. Thus, there is a need to consider a new look at the problem relevant to Russia and for the wider field of study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, the argumentation about Open Innovation as well as about Industry-Science relationships (ISR) -sometimes also called University -Industry Linkages (UI linkages), technology transfer (TT) or knowledge and technology transfer (KTT) -aims at generating value from science and technology (S&T) or in a broader understanding value from science, technology and innovation (STI), the latter extending S&T with innovation (I). Initially, it is assumed that STI generates economic value resulting from innovation which in turn is depending on the inputs from S&T (Kindras et al, 2014). However, a more profound consideration of the application of STI discloses more levels at which value is generated including the broad national level and the societal level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%