1999
DOI: 10.1029/1999jb900124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional heat flow variations across the sedimented Juan de Fuca Ridge eastern flank: Constraints on lithospheric cooling and lateral hydrothermal heat transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
195
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
14
195
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean observed value for this age lithosphere is 80-90 mW/m 2 [20,21], and the difference from conductive models is commonly attributed to the effects of hydrothermal circulation. Heat flow studies at the Juan de Fuca Ridge have shown that, where the oceanic crust is covered with a few hundred metres of sediment, heat flow values return to values consistent with plate cooling models within about 20 km of basement outcrops, suggesting that a relatively thin sediment cover can isolate the hydrothermal system from the open ocean [22]. However, our observed values are low despite the relatively thick sediment cover.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The mean observed value for this age lithosphere is 80-90 mW/m 2 [20,21], and the difference from conductive models is commonly attributed to the effects of hydrothermal circulation. Heat flow studies at the Juan de Fuca Ridge have shown that, where the oceanic crust is covered with a few hundred metres of sediment, heat flow values return to values consistent with plate cooling models within about 20 km of basement outcrops, suggesting that a relatively thin sediment cover can isolate the hydrothermal system from the open ocean [22]. However, our observed values are low despite the relatively thick sediment cover.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…F1A), then flowing toward the east. Some results from Leg 168 were consistent with this view, including seafloor heat flow and basement temperatures that increased and basement fluids that were warmer and more altered with greater distance to the east along the drilling transect (e.g., Davis et al, 1992Davis et al, , 1999Elderfield et al, 1999). But there were inconsistencies with this conceptual model of largescale hydrogeologic flow, especially after Leg 168 results were considered.…”
Section: Operations During Ocean Drilling Program (Odp)supporting
confidence: 63%
“…In addition, reexamination of existing bathymetric data and collection of additional data along western end the Leg 168 transect showed basement outcrops to the north and south that could allow hydrothermal fluids to recharge and discharge, with flow occurring nearly perpendicular to the transect (Hutnak et al, 2006). There was also the vexing problem of explaining where fluids flowing toward the east at the western end of the Leg 168 transect might exit the crust (e.g., Davis et al, 1999). It is not possible for large volumes of fluid to recharge the crust, flow laterally across tens of kilometers, and then be stored indefinitely.…”
Section: Operations During Ocean Drilling Program (Odp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If generalized to the entire flow path between Blanco Saddle and 47°N, heating at this rate corresponds to an 18 month transit time. However, Davis et al [1999] measured heat flux values in the western half of the basin near 48°N that do approach the conductive plate model. Roughly consistent with this tripling of observed heat flow moving north, potential temperature anomalies increase sharply beyond 47°N, acquiring an additional 0.01°C in only 1 degree of latitude (Figure 3c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%