2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00150-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional income redistribution and risk sharing: how does Italy compare in Europe?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of redistribution through public fiscal flows is around 40% (average over several countries) for MacDougall (1977); 30% for Spain in Castells et al (1981); 39% for Canada and 22% for the United States according to Bayoumi and Masson (1995); 38% in France, 26% in UK, 18% in Canada and 16% in the USA in Mélitz and Zummer (1998); 40% for Germany in Duboz and Nicot (1998); 45% on average in several European countries, for Castells (1998). More recently, Barberán et al (2000), estimating equation (1) Finally, Decressin (2002) and Arachi et al (2010) use similar estimates to assess the extent of redistribution in Italy respectively in the periods 1983-1992 and 1996-2002; the former find that the redistributive power of fiscal flows is around 24% while for the latter the estimate is about 28% 16 .…”
Section: << Table 10>>mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of redistribution through public fiscal flows is around 40% (average over several countries) for MacDougall (1977); 30% for Spain in Castells et al (1981); 39% for Canada and 22% for the United States according to Bayoumi and Masson (1995); 38% in France, 26% in UK, 18% in Canada and 16% in the USA in Mélitz and Zummer (1998); 40% for Germany in Duboz and Nicot (1998); 45% on average in several European countries, for Castells (1998). More recently, Barberán et al (2000), estimating equation (1) Finally, Decressin (2002) and Arachi et al (2010) use similar estimates to assess the extent of redistribution in Italy respectively in the periods 1983-1992 and 1996-2002; the former find that the redistributive power of fiscal flows is around 24% while for the latter the estimate is about 28% 16 .…”
Section: << Table 10>>mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 As a term of comparison we also estimate redistribution by the overall public budget. Applying a well developed econometric approach [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], we regress a regional "activity" variable (regional per-capita income) including the fiscal balance on that same variable net of the fiscal balance. The fiscal balance is given by total public expenditure benefiting a regions' residents less total revenues collected from the regions residents.…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the approach proposed by Bayoumi and Masson [26], as later developed by Mélitz and Zumer [34,29], and applied to Italy by Decressin [35] and by Arachi et al [31], a summary measure of interregional redistribution can be obtained by running an OLS estimation on the following model:…”
Section: Specification Of the Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-country analysis includes the so-called MacDougall report (MacDougall, 1977). This seminal reference was commissioned by the EU and and Italy (Obstfeld and Peri, 1988;Decressin, 2002). Disparities in data sources and specifications again make it difficult to compare results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%