1998
DOI: 10.1053/je.1998.v11.a90584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Mean Systolic Myocardial Velocity Estimation by Real-Time Color Doppler Myocardial Imaging: A New Technique for Quantifying Regional Systolic Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
80
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
12
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Physiological differences in contraction times were characterized by an increase in F mc from apex to base, with the highest values in the septal wall as previously described (4). Mean radial endocardial velocity ranged between 3.7 and 6.8 cm/s and were consistent with those provided by Miyatake et al (19), ie, 5.1 Ϯ 1.0 cm/s in the posterior wall and slightly higher than those obtained in another echocardiography study (20) that ranged between 1.9 and 4.9 cm/s. This slight overestimation was probably due to the differences in the directions of measurements (along the ultrasound beam in echocardiography and along the perpendicular to the endocardial border in our approach).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physiological differences in contraction times were characterized by an increase in F mc from apex to base, with the highest values in the septal wall as previously described (4). Mean radial endocardial velocity ranged between 3.7 and 6.8 cm/s and were consistent with those provided by Miyatake et al (19), ie, 5.1 Ϯ 1.0 cm/s in the posterior wall and slightly higher than those obtained in another echocardiography study (20) that ranged between 1.9 and 4.9 cm/s. This slight overestimation was probably due to the differences in the directions of measurements (along the ultrasound beam in echocardiography and along the perpendicular to the endocardial border in our approach).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This slight overestimation was probably due to the differences in the directions of measurements (along the ultrasound beam in echocardiography and along the perpendicular to the endocardial border in our approach). In addition, our values showed the same trend as those described in the literature with the lowest mean radial velocity values in the anteroseptal wall (20,21) and a decrease from apex to base (5). Accordingly, the ability of our technique to detect small physiological delays encourages its application in the context of myocardial ischemia (22) to help in objective detection of LV dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, regional Doppler tissue velocities in one area are affected by motion of the adjacent regions as well as the whole heart translational motion [7][8][9]. Therefore, this method may not be quite accurate in assessing regional wall motion, which has been posed as a limitation of this technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this system, it has become possible to record Doppler signals of low speed but high amplitude caused by the movement of the myocardium. 12,13) During ventricular systole and diastole, arterial wall movements which cause a differentiation in the diameter of the proximal aortic lumen also occur. If these wall movements can be recorded reproducibly by CDTI, it will be possible to form an opinion about the changes in the elastic structure of the aorta.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%