2008
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.126.11.1500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Relationship Between Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Corresponding Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5][6]12,14,[16][17][18] However, most of these studies used the Stratus time Correlation of localized glaucomatous VF defects and SD-OCT RNFL thinning H Wu et al domain OCT to measure RNFL thickness. [2][3][4]6,13,14,16,17 Although in two of these studies, SD-OCT was used to evaluated RNFL thickness, 5,18 the structure-function correspondence maps made in those studies correlated VF test points to regions of the ONH. In the present study, we created a modified OCT-based structurefunction map that shows significant correlation between localized areas of VF loss and SD-OCT measurements of RNFL thinning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[2][3][4][5][6]12,14,[16][17][18] However, most of these studies used the Stratus time Correlation of localized glaucomatous VF defects and SD-OCT RNFL thinning H Wu et al domain OCT to measure RNFL thickness. [2][3][4]6,13,14,16,17 Although in two of these studies, SD-OCT was used to evaluated RNFL thickness, 5,18 the structure-function correspondence maps made in those studies correlated VF test points to regions of the ONH. In the present study, we created a modified OCT-based structurefunction map that shows significant correlation between localized areas of VF loss and SD-OCT measurements of RNFL thinning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAP provides a few parameters (ie, raw threshold values (VF sensitivity), total deviation values, pattern deviation values, MD, and PSD), but which are best fit for functional assessments and statistical analyses? In previous structure-function relationship studies where localized VF defects were correlated to RNFL thickness changes, VF parameters used included mean raw threshold values, 2,9,12,14,15,17 total deviation values, 1,[3][4][5]13,16,18 and pattern deviation values. 16 Total deviation values, which are age-corrected, are less influenced by age than raw threshold values, and they may be more sensitive to detect early diffuse loss compared with pattern deviation values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, ONH angles derived from an optimized RNFL model, as done in this study, relate any location in the visual field to an angle at the ONH, without being restricted to a certain pattern of test locations. Several previous studies explored structure-function relationships by calculating correlations or regression models between visual field sensitivities and measurements of the RNFL thickness, as determined by optical coherence tomography [30][31][32] or by a Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. 33 Our method is able to establish and optimize such a relationship without additional measurements, thereby showing a clear and strong structure-function relationship between the RNFL morphology and the visual field threshold deviation values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%