2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018jb016886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional‐Scale Detection of Fault Scarps and Other Tectonic Landforms: Examples From Northern California

Abstract: Fault scarps and fault-related landforms provide important information about fault zone activity over timescales that are not captured by instrumental measurements or historic records. Semiautomated methods for delineating these landforms using topographic data from light detection and ranging (lidar) and spaceborne imaging systems offer the opportunity to characterize fault zones on a global scale. We present a computationally efficient method for extracting scarp-like landforms from high-resolution (≤ 2 m), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a template length of 200 m, as in Sare et al. (2019), to capture scarp segments of similar length scales. Template matching also produces grid maps of morphologic age, also known as the degradation coefficient κt [m 2 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used a template length of 200 m, as in Sare et al. (2019), to capture scarp segments of similar length scales. Template matching also produces grid maps of morphologic age, also known as the degradation coefficient κt [m 2 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of neotectonic field mapping is often limited by field conditions, inaccessibility, subtle topography, or dense arrays of distributed faulting. To overcome these limitations and identify unmapped faults across a large region of interest, we extracted topographic scarps from our large 3-m resolution DEM using Scarplet, an open-source software package that semi-automatically identifies scarps by matching topographic curvature in a DEM with that of ideal template scarp profiles from the hillslope diffusion equation (described and discussed in Supporting Information S1; Hilley et al [2010]; Sare et al [2019]). This template matching algorithm searches for areas of scarp-like features (usually 10's of meters wide and 100's of meters long; Figure S2 in Supporting Information S1) within DEMs and produces raster grid maps of scarp properties such as best-fit orientation and amplitude (Figure S1 in Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Semi-automatic Template Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insights into Big Data processing from studies such as those discussed above and our work can provide support for a variety of activities in Earth observation. For example, these and similar methods could be applied to the mapping of geologic hazards including landslides [56], sinkholes [57], flood zones [7], tectonic faults [58,59], and coastal erosion [9]. They can also be applied to understand anthropogenic interaction with the environmentfor example, biomass or biomass change [6,47,60,61], agriculture [62], and infrastructure development [8].…”
Section: Other Large-scale Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hodge et al's [25] Scarp Parameter Algorithm (SPARTA) maps normal fault scarps from calibrated slope and curvature parameters. Sare et al's [26] algorithm uses a curvature template and a hillslope diffusion model to map dip-slip fault scarps and calculate height and morphologic age. Howe et al's [27] approach constrains slip by mapping paleolake shorelines from topographic inflection points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%