2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional variation in composition and antimicrobial activity of US propolis against Paenibacillus larvae and Ascosphaera apis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
1
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
79
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of the 12 samples were poor inhibitors of P. larvae growth, but good inhibitors of A. apis growth, suggesting that resin availability in these climatic regions was deficient in terms of providing broad-spectrum antibiotic activity (Wilson et al 2015). Thus, regional differences in floral vegetation (resin donors) can very strongly determine antibiotic activity with highly variable therapeutic potential.…”
Section: Resin and Propolismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four of the 12 samples were poor inhibitors of P. larvae growth, but good inhibitors of A. apis growth, suggesting that resin availability in these climatic regions was deficient in terms of providing broad-spectrum antibiotic activity (Wilson et al 2015). Thus, regional differences in floral vegetation (resin donors) can very strongly determine antibiotic activity with highly variable therapeutic potential.…”
Section: Resin and Propolismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paenibacillus larvae (from stock strains obtained from the USDA Agricultural Research Service culture collection, NRRL no. B-2605) were cultured in brain/heart infusion broth and the bacterial growth assay was conducted following the methods of Wilson et al (2015). Propolis extracts were diluted in acetonitrile to final concentrations ranging from 175 to 8 mg l…”
Section: Seasonal Antimicrobial Activity Of Propolismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous in vitro studies have demonstrated the inhibitory activity of propolis, and specific compounds within propolis, against the growth of the honey bee bacterial pathogen Paenibacillus larvae and Ascosphaera apis (Antúnez et al, 2008;Bastos et al, 2008;Bilikova et al, 2013;Lindenfelser, 1968;Wilson et al, 2013Wilson et al, , 2015. It is not known whether honey bees actually consume propolis, but Johnson et al (2012) demonstrated that when bees were experimentally fed propolis in sucrose syrup, the transcription of three cytochrome 450s, involved in pesticide detoxification, was induced (Johnson et al, 2006;Mao et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few works have studied the role played by these resins in the control and resistance to the diseases in honey bee colonies. Propolis has proven to be active against the main bee threats such as the bacterium Paenibacillus larvae (Antúnez et al, 2008;Bastos et al, 2008;Mihai et al, 2012), the fungus Ascosphaera apis (Wilson et al, 2015), and the mite Varroa destructor (Damiani et al, 2010). In colonies of Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), the propolis added into the nest environment modified the expression of immunerelated genes in the exposed worker bees (Simone, Evans, & Spivak, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%