2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203698723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regionalism in Post-Suharto Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The end of the New Order era, with the fall of President Suharto in 1998, ushered in an era of massive reform, eventually giving rise to a program of decentralization (supported by regional autonomy laws implemented in 2001), which gave widespread fiscal powers to the district heads, and cultural autonomy to districts (Aspinall and Fealy, 2003;Kingsbury and Aveling, 2003;Erb et al, 2005;Schult-Nordholt and van Klinken, 2007) and eventually a type of political autonomy, when a direct election system for district heads was implemented in 2005 (Erb and Sulistiyanto, 2009). The new laws on regional autonomy not only allocated more power to make fiscal decisions on investment to the district, but also profits from resources would be more fairly allocated to the various regions from which they originated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The end of the New Order era, with the fall of President Suharto in 1998, ushered in an era of massive reform, eventually giving rise to a program of decentralization (supported by regional autonomy laws implemented in 2001), which gave widespread fiscal powers to the district heads, and cultural autonomy to districts (Aspinall and Fealy, 2003;Kingsbury and Aveling, 2003;Erb et al, 2005;Schult-Nordholt and van Klinken, 2007) and eventually a type of political autonomy, when a direct election system for district heads was implemented in 2005 (Erb and Sulistiyanto, 2009). The new laws on regional autonomy not only allocated more power to make fiscal decisions on investment to the district, but also profits from resources would be more fairly allocated to the various regions from which they originated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Seiring dengan kebijakan desentralisasi dan menguatnya politik identitas, identitas lokal yang sebelumnya tidak mendapatkan tempat dalam rejim sentralisasi, kini menemukan kembali ruang eksistensinya. Desentralisasi telah memunculkan kembali sentimen-sentimen identitas lokal dan politik identitas yang 'membahayakan' kesetiaan warga terhadap negara (Lihat misalnya Aspinall & Fealy, 2003;Erb, Sulistiyanto, & Faucher, 2005;Robinson, 2011;Schulte Nordholt & Klinken, 2007). Ada kekhawatiran bahwa politik identitas dapat mengancam sikap nasionalisme dan pluralism (Zahrotunnimah, 2018).…”
Section: Artikelunclassified
“…Correspondence to: Lene Pedersen, Department of Anthropology and Museum Studies, Central Washington University, 400 University Way, Ellensburg, WA 98926, USA. Email: pedersenl@cwu.edu pertaining to inter-religious interactions in Indonesia in this critical period, as the tight grip of Suharto's New Order reign released, and the nation re-instituted parliamentary democracy and embarked on a path toward regional autonomy (Aspinall and Fealy 2003;Erb, Faucher, and Sulistiyanto 2005;Pedersen 2007;Schulte Nordholt 2007;Schulte Nordholt and Abdullah 2002;Holzappel and Ramstedt 2008). 2 Religion, of course, helps provide group affiliation and an orienting framework in times of change, both as expression of social relations in the classic Durkheimian sense ([1912] 1995) and as ideological construct offering 'visions of potentiality' (Kapferer, Telle, and Eriksen 2010, 8).…”
Section: Religious Pluralism In Indonesia Lene Pedersenmentioning
confidence: 99%