2017
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.13833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regressed melanocytic nevi secondary to pembrolizumab therapy: an emerging melanocytic dermatologic effect from immune checkpoint antibody blockade

Abstract: Regressed melanocytic nevi are an emerging dermatologic effect from pembrolizumab therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changing melanocytic nevi were seldom (<1%) reported in patients receiving pembrolizumab. 52 As with nivolumab, acneiform, DHR, eczematous, erythematous, lichenoid and bullous pemphigoid were all seldom (<1%) events in patients, and the maculopapular type of dermatologic toxicity sometimes (∼2%) occurred. Radiation-associated dermatitis, psoriasiform reactions and vasculopathic changes were seen with pembrolizumab, but have not yet been reported with nivolumab.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Changing melanocytic nevi were seldom (<1%) reported in patients receiving pembrolizumab. 52 As with nivolumab, acneiform, DHR, eczematous, erythematous, lichenoid and bullous pemphigoid were all seldom (<1%) events in patients, and the maculopapular type of dermatologic toxicity sometimes (∼2%) occurred. Radiation-associated dermatitis, psoriasiform reactions and vasculopathic changes were seen with pembrolizumab, but have not yet been reported with nivolumab.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The relative frequency of vitiligo or pigment alteration‐associated dermatologic toxicity with pembrolizumab was encountered in more patients (∼7%) as compared with nivolumab (∼3%: Table ). Changing melanocytic nevi were seldom (<1%) reported in patients receiving pembrolizumab . As with nivolumab, acneiform, DHR, eczematous, erythematous, lichenoid and bullous pemphigoid were all seldom (<1%) events in patients, and the maculopapular type of dermatologic toxicity sometimes (∼2%) occurred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such Sutton phenomenon seems the most obvious illustration of immune infiltration affecting benign skin lesions during immunotherapy, which probably occurs more frequently than expected. Indeed, one case of nevi inflammation without a halo was recently reported, as was disappearance of lentigines and seborrheic keratosis without a halo during pembrolizumab therapy and regressed melanocytic nevi secondary to pembrolizumab therapy . The fate of cutaneous benign lesions during immunotherapy is probably related to not only the shared antigen‐directed responses but also the nonspecific effect of a PD1 inhibitor on PDL‐1–expressing benign lesions .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these therapeutic successes must be continuously balanced with accompanying toxicities as cancer patients receiving CPI therapy may develop a diverse array of cutaneous immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) that vary clinically from inflammatory dermatitides to reactions that target cutaneous melanocytes resulting in vitiligo or regression of preexisting nevi . Inflammatory‐related cutaneous irAEs of any grade may occur in up to ~40‐50% of patients treated with CPI therapy .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%