Regression-based reference limits: determination of sufficient sample size

Abstract

Regression analysis is the method of choice for the production of covariate-dependent reference limits. There are currently no recommendations on what sample size should be used when regression-based reference limits and confidence intervals are calculated. In this study we used Monte Carlo simulation to study a reference sample group of 374 age-dependent hemoglobin values. From this sample, 5000 random subsamples, with replacement, were constructed with 10–220 observations per sample. Regression analysis was used to estimate age-dependent 95% reference intervals for hemoglobin concentrations and erythrocyte counts. The maximum difference between mean values of the root mean square error and original values for hemoglobin was 0.05 g/L when the sample size was ≥60. The parameter estimators and width of reference intervals changed negligibly from the values calculated from the original sample regardless of what sample size was used. SDs and CVs for these factors changed rapidly up to a sample size of 30; after that changes were smaller. The largest and smallest absolute differences in root mean square error and width of reference interval between sample values and values calculated from the original sample were also evaluated. As expected, differences were largest in small sample sizes, and as sample size increased differences decreased. To obtain appropriate reference limits and confidence intervals, we propose the following scheme: (a) check whether the assumptions of regression analysis can be fulfilled with/without transformation of data; (b) check that the value of v, which describes how the covariate value is situated in relation to both the mean value and the spread of the covariate values, does not exceed 0.1 at minimum and maximum covariate positions; and (c) if steps 1 and 2 can be accepted, the reference limits with confidence intervals can be produced by regression analysis, and the minimum acceptable sample size will be ∼70.

Reduced total testosterone concentrations in young healthy South Asian men are partly explained by increased insulin resistance but not by altered adiposity

“…, 17 which correlates well with free testosterone measured by equilibrium dialysis and bioavailable testosterone measured following ammonium sulphate precipitation across a broad range of total testosterone values. Sample sizes were determined using the recommendations of Virtanen et al ., 18 who have previously demonstrated that a sample size of 60–80 is large enough to calculate reference limits and confidence intervals for analyte estimation by a regression method. More directly relevant to this study, using a sample size of at least 63 subjects in each group provides 80% power to detect a shift of 0·5 SD in total testosterone.…”

Investigations of thyroid hormones and antibodies based on a community health survey: the Busselton thyroid study

“…Various methods have been used to determine population‐specific reference intervals 21–24 . The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) guidelines 25 outline a procedure to select subjects for a descriptive study of normal thyroid parameters in a population.…”

Design and other methodological considerations for the construction of human fetal and neonatal size and growth charts

“…Later in 2016, Hanley discusses sample size considerations for the case of simple and multiple linear regressions. Regression analysis can be used to obtain reference limits that account for factors such as age, gender, and parity with corresponding confidence intervals . In clinical chemistry, analytical variability is usually accounted for when developing and establishing references .…”