Abstract-Numerous studies addressed the predictive value of the nighttime blood pressure (BP) as captured by ambulatory monitoring. However, arbitrary cutoff limits in dichotomized analyses of continuous variables, data dredging across selected subgroups, extrapolation of cross-sectional studies to prospective outcomes, and lack of comprehensive adjustments for confounders make interpretation of the literature difficult. We reviewed prospective studies with total mortality or a composite cardiovascular end point as an outcome in relation to the level and the circadian profile of systolic BP. We analyzed studies in hypertensive patients (nϭ23 856) separately from those in individuals randomly recruited from populations (nϭ9641). We pooled summary statistics and individual subject data, respectively. In both patients and populations, in analyses in which nighttime BP was additionally adjusted for daytime BP and vice versa, nighttime BP was a stronger predictor than daytime BP. With adjustment for the 24-hour BP, both the night-to-day BP ratio and dipping status remained significant predictors of outcome but added little prognostic value over and beyond the 24-hour BP level. In the absence of conclusive evidence proving that nondipping is a reversible risk factor, the option whether or not to restore the diurnal blood pressure profile to a normal pattern should be left to the clinical judgment of doctors and should be individualized for each patient. Current guidelines on the interpretation of ambulatory BP recording need to be updated. (Hypertension. 2011;57:3-10.) • Online Data Supplement Key Words: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring Ⅲ dipping status Ⅲ nighttime blood pressure Ⅲ night-to-day blood pressure ratio Ⅲ population science Ⅲ risk factors A mbulatory monitoring enables recording the blood pressure throughout the entire day, while subjects engage in their usual day-to-day activities. 1,2 The diurnal blood pressure profile normally includes a 10% to 20% fall in blood pressure during sleep, which is driven by physical inactivity and which is largely independent of an endogenous rhythm. 3 Indeed, in shift workers, the 24-hour blood pressure level and the fall in blood pressure during sleep were similar on days with daytime and nighttime work. 3 In 1988, O'Brien et al 4 reported for the first time that patients with an abnormal circadian blood pressure profile with a less marked decrease in the nighttime blood pressure had a more frequent history of stroke. O'Brien and colleagues thereby coined the terms dipping versus nondipping. Subsequent studies of hypertensive cohorts 5-24 and populations [25][26][27][28][29][30] did not all 8,15,18,26,30 corroborate the worse prognosis associated with a high nighttime blood pressure. Moreover, interpretation of these studies is not always easy. First, positive results based on arbitrary and varying definitions of nondipping were sometimes not supported by analysis of the nocturnal blood pressure fall as a continuous variable. 7,15 Second, in some reports signific...