2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regression Rate Study of Cylindrical Stepped Fuel Grain of Hybrid Rocket

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the pressure oscillation was measured to be only about 4% of the chamber mean pressure [120]. Kumar and Joshi [124]-instead of using only two different cylindrical fuel grains-utilized five fuel grain cylinders with two different inner diameters (25 mm and 35 mm). The grain parts were glued together (with alternating inner diameters) to create a stepped grain.…”
Section: Turbulence and Heat Transfer Enhancing Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the pressure oscillation was measured to be only about 4% of the chamber mean pressure [120]. Kumar and Joshi [124]-instead of using only two different cylindrical fuel grains-utilized five fuel grain cylinders with two different inner diameters (25 mm and 35 mm). The grain parts were glued together (with alternating inner diameters) to create a stepped grain.…”
Section: Turbulence and Heat Transfer Enhancing Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve a higher regression rate with common fuel block manufacturing, multiple grains with different geometries or geometrical orientations can be stacked. Examples are stepped fuel blocks [2] or multiport geometries, which are rotated against each other [3][4][5]. The disadvantage of such methods is the inconsistent regression rate over the fuel block length due to higher regression rates only occurring in vortex areas [2,4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are stepped fuel blocks [2] or multiport geometries, which are rotated against each other [3][4][5]. The disadvantage of such methods is the inconsistent regression rate over the fuel block length due to higher regression rates only occurring in vortex areas [2,4,5]. Common ways to create a geometry of the fuel grain are limited to a constant shape over the fuel block length due to manufacturing effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken from [5] with permission. References (from top to bottom): AIEB [119], Bi-vortex [120], AP + Ferric oxide [121], Helical grain [122], Bluff body [123], Paraffin [124], DTI [125], GAP [126], Multi section swirl [127], Expandable graphite [128], Aluminium hydride [129], Head-end swirl [130], CAMUI fuel port [131], Double tube [132], Two section swirl [133], Concave-convex [134], Armoured grain [58], Diaphragm (4 hole) [135], Amorphous aluminium [136], 5-stepped fuel [137], Vortex injection [138], Single step [139], Single diaphragm [140], Carbon nano tubes [141], Carbon black [142], Transition metal [143], Multi segmented grain [144], Hollow cone injector [145], Nested helix [59].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%