2011
DOI: 10.1214/ecp.v16-1681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regular $g$-measures are not always Gibbsian

Abstract: 9 pagesInternational audienceRegular $g$-measures are discrete-time processes determined by conditional expectations with respect to the past. One-dimensional Gibbs measures, on the other hand, are fields determined by simultaneous conditioning on past and future. For the Markovian and exponentially continuous cases both theories are known to be equivalent. Its equivalence for more general cases was an open problem. We present a simple example settling this issue in a negative way: there exist $g$-measures tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the past are not necessarily continuous functions of this past. It was shown before that there exist g-measures which are not Gibbs measures [25]; our result answers a question raised in [27] and shows that neither class of measures contains the other one. Although the question had been posed before, it seems to be the case that there were no precise conjectures whether these Dyson Gibbs measures actually were g-measures or not.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the past are not necessarily continuous functions of this past. It was shown before that there exist g-measures which are not Gibbs measures [25]; our result answers a question raised in [27] and shows that neither class of measures contains the other one. Although the question had been posed before, it seems to be the case that there were no precise conjectures whether these Dyson Gibbs measures actually were g-measures or not.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, it is far from obvious if such a description is always easily possible (see e.g. [27,28,25]). In fact, the non-equivalence between one-sided and two-sided conditionings, which we will demonstrate in detail later, serves as a warning to a too easy identification.…”
Section: General Definitions and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, slight differences exist between the approaches coming from probability theory Georgii [1988], mathematical statistical mechanics Dobrushin [1968] or dynamical systems/ergodic theory Bowen [2008]. See also Fernandez et al [2011] for a discussion on different notions.…”
Section: Transition Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were introduced in the thirties and repeatedly rediscovered (under different names) [16,50,37,45,44]. A few years ago, Fernández, Gallo and Maillard [24] constructed a g-measure -with one-sided continuous conditional probabilities-which is not a Gibbs measure, as its two-sided conditional probabilities are not continuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%