Regularisierungen irregulär aufhältiger Migrantinnen und Migranten

Abstract

Verwaltungsverfahren 2. Antragstellung a. Amtswegigkeit b. Allgemeine Erteilungsvoraussetzungen und Versagungsgründe c. Verfahrensende d. Verfestigung des Aufenthalts 3. Abgrenzungsfragen 4. Kompetenzen und Behörden in Bezug auf das Fremdenrecht Aufenthaltsrecht b. "Aufenthaltserlaubnis zur Strafverfolgung" -Deutschland 2. Erteilungsvoraussetzungen a. Aufenthaltsrecht b. "Befristete Aufenthaltsberechtigung aus humanitären Gründen" für Opfer von Straftaten -Spanien 3. Erteilungsvoraussetzungen a.

A critical-contextual approach in comparative migration law

“…From a migrant-centred perspective, this is central because -as described below (Section 3.3) -many other rights are attached to the right to residence. In Spain, regularisations, i.e., extraordinary residence permits, constitute almost 20% of all residence permits -ordinary and extraordinary -that are issued each year [Hinterberger, (2020), p.267 with further references and p.283]. In Spain, the residence permit 'social settlement' (arraigo social) 4 is issued most frequently and can be considered as the most important regularisation [Cerezo Mariscal, (2015), pp.677f and 680].…”

“…In Austria, regularisations do not play a significant role [Hinterberger, (2020), pp.234f and 283]. There are less regularisation possibilities and those that do exist are not or should not be so effective in practice.…”

“…Further, 'a foreigner who is enforceably required to leave' Germany may be granted a temporary residence permit according to §25(5) German Residence Act 'if departure is impossible in fact or in law and the obstacle to deportation is not likely to be removed in the foreseeable future'. Said residence permit represents the quantitatively most important regularisation in German law [Hinterberger, (2020), p.341] and is again derived from Art. 8 ECHR.…”

“…Having said that and to contribute to the operation and application of the critical-contextual approach generally, the present article carves out the method of critical-contextual comparison relying on certain findings of a case study on regularisations of irregularly staying migrants in the EU, in particular in Germany, Austria and Spain by Hinterberger (2020Hinterberger ( , 2023. The aim is to demonstrate how criticalcontextual comparison can be undertaken in the area of migration law and the problems and challenges that may arise (Section 3).…”

Human Rights Challenges to European Migration Policy

“…We concur with the legal scholarship that regards this practice as a violation of the Return Directive. 637 In particular, when per sistent non-removability results from Human Rights -be it Art. 8 ECHR or, even more so, the principle of non-refoulement -the discretion under Art.…”