2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/793/1/19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularity Underlying Complexity: A Redshift-Independent Description of the Continuous Variation of Galaxy-Scale Molecular Gas Properties in the Mass-Star Formation Rate Plane

Abstract: Star-forming galaxies (SFGs) display a continuous specific star formation rate (sSFR) distribution which can be approximated by two log-normal functions: one encompassing the galaxy main sequence, the other a rarer, starbursting population. Starburst sSFRs can be regarded as outcome of a physical process (plausibly merging) taking the mathematical form of a log-normal boosting kernel that enhances star formation activity. We explore the utility of splitting the star-forming population into main-sequence and st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

104
656
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(769 citation statements)
references
References 229 publications
(453 reference statements)
104
656
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This is regardless of the choice of a CO . Thorough studies of galaxies along this sequence support our choice for a higher value of a CO (e.g., Daddi et al 2010a;Genzel et al 2010Genzel et al , 2015Sargent et al 2014). Further support for our choice comes from the position of our sources along the "main sequence" of galaxies (Figure 1).…”
Section: Co Versus Dust-based Ism Massesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This is regardless of the choice of a CO . Thorough studies of galaxies along this sequence support our choice for a higher value of a CO (e.g., Daddi et al 2010a;Genzel et al 2010Genzel et al , 2015Sargent et al 2014). Further support for our choice comes from the position of our sources along the "main sequence" of galaxies (Figure 1).…”
Section: Co Versus Dust-based Ism Massesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The molecular hydrogen (H2) masses within the IRAM 22 arcsec beam can be computed as M ap H 2 =L CO × αCO (in the rest of the paper we refer to M ap H 2 as simply MH 2 ). We compute CO-to-gas conversion factors αCO on a per-galaxy basis following the "2-Star Formation Mode (SFM)" framework of Sargent et al (2014). Specifically, αCO values are calculated as:…”
Section: Co Luminosities and Molecular Gas Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…αCO,SB deviates from the MS-αCO by an amount which depends on the intensity of the starburst (i.e. on the sSFR offset from the main sequence, see Sargent et al (2014) for a full description of the underlying calculations). For this sample, metallicities are taken from Tremonti et al (2004).…”
Section: Co Luminosities and Molecular Gas Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our results with the empirical predictions by Sargent et al (2014) and with semi-analytical cosmological models by Lagos et al (2011) and Obreschkow et al (2009a,b), as well as with the observed CO luminosity function at z = 0 as measured by Keres et al (2003). We place our constraints in the following way: We bin the CO blind detections in terms of CO luminosity, and we normalize to the volume of the universe in each redshift interval.…”
Section: Co Luminosity Functions and Molecular Gas Contentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The luminosity Figure 1. The evolution of the cosmic H2 mass density, ρH2 (z) based on predictions from semi-analytical comological models (Obreschkow et al 2009a, 2009b, Lagos et al 2011 as well as the empirical predictions by Sargent et al (2014). The blue-shaded area shows only the contribution of our blind detections to ρ(MH2 ), not corrected/extrapolated for a population of undetected sources at lower or higher L C O , while the limits from the CO stacks over a H-band flux-limited sample of galaxies are shown as red points and arrows.…”
Section: Co Luminosity Functions and Molecular Gas Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%