2011
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.20206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularization in parallel MR image reconstruction

Abstract: Parallel MRI has brought forward new applications by reducing the scan time in MR image acquisition. The acceleration is achieved by reducing the number of phase encode steps acquired during the image acquisition thus giving aliased images. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) is a widely used method to unwrap the aliased images. One major problem is the noise amplification during the process of reconstruction as well as the artifacts, which may arise during the reconstruction process. Regularization is an important t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, voxel exclusion in SENSE unfolding is achieved through regularization instead of masking, as is clearly explained by Omer and Dickinson . There are no obvious reasons why this would not be compatible with rFOX inclusion in the coil sensitivity maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice, voxel exclusion in SENSE unfolding is achieved through regularization instead of masking, as is clearly explained by Omer and Dickinson . There are no obvious reasons why this would not be compatible with rFOX inclusion in the coil sensitivity maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an additional effort to be performed before starting a new study that focusses on a particular region of interest, but results in a more effective scan protocol of which the cumulative benefits will be paramount when applied to a large number of examinations. In practice, voxel exclusion in SENSE unfolding is achieved through regularization instead of masking, as is clearly explained by Omer and Dickinson (28). There are no obvious reasons why this would not be compatible with rFOX inclusion in the coil sensitivity maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other way to decrease the MRI scanning time is to under-sample the kspace by leaving out some of the encoding lines. This results in a smaller field of view (FOV) which significantly reduces signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [18].…”
Section: Cs-mri and Pocs Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISNR is expected to be positive with a better image quality for higher values. Artifact power (AP) is another evaluation parameter of reconstruction that has been derived from “square difference error,” which can be computed as (Omer and Dickinson, ): AP =i|xtrue(itrue)bold-italicx̂(i)|2i,j|x(i)|2 …”
Section: The Proposed Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%