2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulate the lattice oxygen activity and structural stability of lithium-rich layered oxides by integrated strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can lead to an increase in the oxidation state of Ni 2+ as a compensatory measure to balance the overall charge. On the other hand, as shown in Figure b, the Co 2p 3/2 binding energy is measured at 780.8 eV, a value matches to the reported binding energy of Co 3+ in layered LiMO 2 (where M stands for Ni, Co, and Mn). , In Figure c, the Mn 2p spectra reveal a Mn 2p 3/2 peak that fits well as a single peak with a binding energy of 642.7 eV. This observation is consistent with the presence of Mn 4+ ions, as observed in manganese-based layered compounds .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This can lead to an increase in the oxidation state of Ni 2+ as a compensatory measure to balance the overall charge. On the other hand, as shown in Figure b, the Co 2p 3/2 binding energy is measured at 780.8 eV, a value matches to the reported binding energy of Co 3+ in layered LiMO 2 (where M stands for Ni, Co, and Mn). , In Figure c, the Mn 2p spectra reveal a Mn 2p 3/2 peak that fits well as a single peak with a binding energy of 642.7 eV. This observation is consistent with the presence of Mn 4+ ions, as observed in manganese-based layered compounds .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…XRD tests were completed, and the XRD patterns of the obtained materials are shown in Figure . Both the materials correspond to α-NaFeO 2 layered structures, including the monoclinic phase part Li 2 MnO 3 (C2/m) and the hexagonal phase part LiMO 2 ( R 3̅ m ). , The (006)/(012) and (108)/(110) bimodal splitting of the material is obvious, indicating that the material has a good layer structure. , In addition, there is no significant shift in the (003) and (104) peak of the LRO@LZO-1% compared with the LRO material, which indicates that the Li 2 ZrO 3 is not doped into the internal lattice of the material. Combined with the analysis of the distribution of Zr in Figure , it can be shown that LZO is successfully coated on the primary particles of the material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…. 27,28 The (006)/(012) and ( 108)/ (110) bimodal splitting of the material is obvious, indicating that the material has a good layer structure. 29,30 In addition, there is no significant shift in the (003) and (104) peak of the LRO@LZO-1% compared with the LRO material, which indicates that the Li 2 ZrO 3 is not doped into the internal lattice of the material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…所示。目前,人们对于全固态锂电池中富锂正极材料氧释放而导致的界面问题仍 存在争议。 尽管 Kanno 等 [29] 证明在全固态薄膜电池中致密的固体界面可以避免液 态锂电池中的电解液分解、锰离子溶解和 Li 2 MnO 3 的氧析出等问题,有助于稳定 Li 2 MnO 3 正极的表面结构,但目前多数研究结果仍认为高压正极材料在全固态锂 电池中会发生氧释放导致界面降解,并且需要通过正极材料界面改性以提高正极 /电解质界面的稳定性,如图 2(c)所示 [34,35] 。因此,富锂正极材料的界面问题 在不同电解质体系中情况可能存在差异,需要对不同电解质体系下的界面反应机 制和原理进行进一步研究。 第三,电化学-机械力学失效。不可逆的晶格氧损失将不可避免地加速结构畸 变,使得循环过程中不利的层状结构向尖晶石结构转变,表现为严重的电压衰减 和容量衰减 [36,37] ,最终导致富锂全固态锂电池的失效。近期有研究表明 [38,39] ,晶 格氧损失会导致层状氧化物正极出现应力应变畴,进而诱发孔洞和裂纹,而且正 极材料的体积变化和界面反应会导致正极/电解质的力学失效。因此,富锂正极材 料中氧的氧化还原反应不可逆性以及相变导致的体积变化,有可能使富锂全固态 锂电池存在更严重的电化学-机械力学失效,但 该研究目前仍处于初始阶段,所以 其相关报道较少。 图2 富锂固态复合正极界面电子和离子迁移的示意图 [21] composite cathode with modified Li-rich cathode materials [21] .…”
Section: 富锂正极材料在全固态锂电池中的失效机制unclassified