2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67365-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean: Much Ado About Nothing?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These provisions are expanded upon and strengthened in UNFSA. Changing transboundary distributions and migrations of fish between EEZs or EEZs and the high seas may bring governance challenges beyond assessment-related issues (Pinsky et al 2018;Rayfuse 2018). Failure to agree on allocation of straddling fish stocks is a major reason why lasting agreements on management can be difficult to reach, as seen with pelagic species in the North-east Atlantic in recent years (Bjørndal & Ekerhovd 2014;Toumasatos & Steinshamn 2018).…”
Section: Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These provisions are expanded upon and strengthened in UNFSA. Changing transboundary distributions and migrations of fish between EEZs or EEZs and the high seas may bring governance challenges beyond assessment-related issues (Pinsky et al 2018;Rayfuse 2018). Failure to agree on allocation of straddling fish stocks is a major reason why lasting agreements on management can be difficult to reach, as seen with pelagic species in the North-east Atlantic in recent years (Bjørndal & Ekerhovd 2014;Toumasatos & Steinshamn 2018).…”
Section: Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are, however, rules in UNCLOS and UNFSA delineating the principles for allocation of resources in such situations (Henriksen & Hoel 2011). Rayfuse (2018) points out that stocks that migrate into high seas areas may have less conservation value for coastal states, and stocks shifting distribution across maritime zones may, therefore, in the absence of agreements on management, face increased fishing pressure.…”
Section: Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This CAOF agreement has been represented as the first preventive, international agreement of such magnitude (Harvey, 2018;Rayfuse, 2018;NOAA Fisheries, 2018). Currently there is no fishing activity actively occurring in the CAO, but exploratory fisheries have been conducted in that area in the past (Harvey, 2018).…”
Section: Opportunities and Threats Related To Governance Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%