2009
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00661-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating the Activity of Class II Transactivator by Posttranslational Modifications: Exploring the Possibilities

Abstract: 4First identified as the master regulator of major histocompatibility complex II transcription, class II transactivator (CIITA) has since been implicated in a host of pathologies by modulating the transcription of multiple different genes. How CIITA caters to cell-and tissue-specific transcriptional needs is hotly debated and investigated. One of the possible mechanisms underlying spatiotemporal control of CIITA transcriptional activity is the posttranslational modification (PTM) machinery that refines certain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CIITA activity can be modulated by its post-translational modifications11. We postulated that PRMT1 might directly methylate CIITA to influence its activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CIITA activity can be modulated by its post-translational modifications11. We postulated that PRMT1 might directly methylate CIITA to influence its activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas CIITA loss-of-function mutations leads to ineffectual MHC II transactivation and immunodeficiency, CIITA hyperactivation is associated with aberrant MHC II transactivation and chronic inflammation10. CIITA activity can be modulated at both transcriptional and post-translational levels11. Previously we have shown that several different post-translational modifications contribute to differential modulation of CIITA activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, to our knowledge, this paper presents the first identification of a domain responsible for the nuclear export of CIITA. The specific import and export of CIITA is regulated by posttranslational modifications of CIITA (33), notably GTP binding, acetylation, phosphorylation, and the LRR in the COOH terminus. Binding of GTP to the GBD (aa 336-702) correlates with self-association and increased nuclear localization of CIITA (47,48,62) and increased transactivation of class II genes (49,63).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structurally, CIITA is a member of the NLR/Caterpillar family of genes (32) and contains a multitude of regulatory domains, including an N-terminal acidic domain responsible for transactivation; a PST domain rich in proline, serine, and threonine residues that show susceptibility to phosphorylation by several different kinases; a GTP binding domain (GBD) involved in regulating self-association, nuclear localization, and promoter transactivation; and a leucine-rich region (LRR) common to all NLR/Caterpillar proteins that modulates complex formation, nuclear localization, and CIITA-mediated gene activation (28,30,33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the inability of CIITA to interact with Tax in vitro cannot be ascribed to the incapacity of CIITA to self-associate in vitro , because, as mentioned above, the dimerization-deficient CIITAΔ253–410 mutant retains the ability to inhibit Tax-1 in vivo . Other modifications of CIITA, including acetylation, deacetylation, and ubiquitination (Spilianakis et al, 2000; Wu et al, 2009 and references therein), might have a major role in Tax-1-binding. Such PTMs have been reported to affect the interaction of CIITA with cellular factors involved in MHC-II transcription (Greer et al, 2003) and the recruitment of either corepressors or coactivators on different promoters (Xu et al, 2008; Wu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Ciita Targets Tax-1 and Tax-2 Transactivators To Inhibit Virmentioning
confidence: 99%