1982
DOI: 10.3917/cale.aglie.1982.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Régulation et crises du capitalisme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
42

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
42
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is a recognition of the need to be less in thrall to dominant paradigms (Quist and Vergragt, 2006: 1030), this remains circumscribed by the imperative of expanding business planning horizons to encompass major regime shifts (Quist, 2007: 55). Now, from a business standpoint, this would indeed make perfect sense: the horizons of mainstream economics truly neglect large-scale structures such as the accumulation regimes described by regulation theory (Aglietta, 1976), long-term shifts between them, and crucially , the specific energy profile each regime tends to have . But the problem remains that, given the embedded path-dependencies of speculative finance capital and militarism (Biel, 2012), a green future may need to free itself from the capitalist mode of production, and even class society as a whole, not just one structural phase of it; a futurology which truly steps outside dominant paradigms must at least pose this question.…”
Section: Backcasting: a Critical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a recognition of the need to be less in thrall to dominant paradigms (Quist and Vergragt, 2006: 1030), this remains circumscribed by the imperative of expanding business planning horizons to encompass major regime shifts (Quist, 2007: 55). Now, from a business standpoint, this would indeed make perfect sense: the horizons of mainstream economics truly neglect large-scale structures such as the accumulation regimes described by regulation theory (Aglietta, 1976), long-term shifts between them, and crucially , the specific energy profile each regime tends to have . But the problem remains that, given the embedded path-dependencies of speculative finance capital and militarism (Biel, 2012), a green future may need to free itself from the capitalist mode of production, and even class society as a whole, not just one structural phase of it; a futurology which truly steps outside dominant paradigms must at least pose this question.…”
Section: Backcasting: a Critical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the economy is somewhat reified and international political economy is only addressed to the extent that it falls into the categories of international relations theory – that is, the ‘classic’ triad of realism, liberalism and Marxism. Other approaches – such as that of the French Regulation School, which emphasizes the destabilizing contradictions within capitalism itself (Aglietta, 1976), or Susan Strange’s (1998: 43–119) four power structures – are neglected. Again, I am certainly not interested in criticizing the securitization approach, but simply seek to show that Buzan and colleagues approach the boundary between finance and security from a specific direction that illuminates certain aspects, thereby leaving other aspects unnoticed.…”
Section: Security and Finance: A Problematic Relationship?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet it is neither the systems nor the programmes that characterize our European social approach. It is rather the collective decisions on the labour-income nexus (or 'rapport salarial' -see Boyer, 1990;Aglietta, 1997) which underpin the welfare systems that are of importance. Some simple indicators help to make the point, beginning with a comparison between the European Union and the United States.…”
Section: The European Social Model: Illusion or Firm Foundation For 'Social Europe'?mentioning
confidence: 99%