2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02803345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of eelgrass (Zostera marina) cover along depth gradients in Danish coastal waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One may be that the regression assumes that the relation between eelgrass cover and number of waterbirds is the same throughout the time series and this may not be the case, as birds could exert topdown control during periods with sparse eelgrass populations. Eelgrass meadows at 0-1 m are also more affected than those at 1-2 m by physical disturbances from ice scour in winter, wave action (Krause-Jensen et al, 2003) and possibly also from drifting macroalgae and burrowing fauna which may hamper the establishment of seedlings (Valdemarsen et al, 2010). As eelgrass meadows become sparse they also loose resilience, and feed-back mechanisms may act to maintain the state of reduced cover, e.g., through increased sediment resuspension (Maxwell et al, 2016).…”
Section: Relationships Between Abundances Of Eelgrass and Water Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may be that the regression assumes that the relation between eelgrass cover and number of waterbirds is the same throughout the time series and this may not be the case, as birds could exert topdown control during periods with sparse eelgrass populations. Eelgrass meadows at 0-1 m are also more affected than those at 1-2 m by physical disturbances from ice scour in winter, wave action (Krause-Jensen et al, 2003) and possibly also from drifting macroalgae and burrowing fauna which may hamper the establishment of seedlings (Valdemarsen et al, 2010). As eelgrass meadows become sparse they also loose resilience, and feed-back mechanisms may act to maintain the state of reduced cover, e.g., through increased sediment resuspension (Maxwell et al, 2016).…”
Section: Relationships Between Abundances Of Eelgrass and Water Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is probable that unfavorable chemical sediment conditions are more of a problem for deep, shaded eelgrass populations than for populations living in shallow light saturated habitats; while soft sediments with low anchorage support are more problematic for shallow eelgrass populations in exposed environments. A combination of unfavorable physico-chemical sediment conditions across the entire depth range may, therefore, further accentuate the pattern of eelgrass being constrained to intermediate water depths where moderate light levels are combined with moderate levels of physical exposure (Krause-Jensen et al 2003). If depth limits rose to exclude eelgrass from all but very shallow waters, due to extremely high turbidity, plants growing within the depth limit would be highly vulnerable to higher drag forces in the shallow waters.…”
Section: The Sea Bottom Exerts a Threshold Effect On Eelgrass Depth Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reinke (1889), Waern (1952) andvon Wachenfeldt (1975) as well as Boström et al (2003), Martin (1999), and Krause-Jensen et al (2003).…”
Section: Refconmentioning
confidence: 99%