“…[66] On the other hand, HNO 3 -MIL-101(Cr) has reaction mixtures with molar ratios of Cr:H 2 BDC:HNO 3 :H 2 O = 1:1:1:277 [12,69,73,88] or 1:1:1:265. [18,31,72] The reaction conditions for HCl-MIL-101(Cr) and HNO 3 -MIL-101(Cr) bear close semblance to the HF-based syntheses at 200-220 °C for 8, [12,17,18,55,62,70,72,74] 10, [59,65,82] 12, [57,60,64,66,71] or even 15 h. [68,81,86,87] Reports suggest that using HCl instead of HF reduces the MIL-101(Cr) particle sizes (e.g., decreasing from 500-1500 to 200-1200 nm) [17] whereas replacing HF with HNO 3 seems to increase MIL-101(Cr) crystallite sizes (e.g., increasing from 560-1100 to 720-1490 nm). [31,69] Specifically, by lowering the pH of the reaction mixture, HNO 3 reduces the crystal nucleation speeds to form larger crystallites.…”