Cell Culture in Pharmaceutical Research 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03011-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Progesterone Receptor Activity in Cell Culture Systems and Cell-Free Transcription

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 1A, 35 S-labeled dTAF II 110 was retained on beads containing DNA-bound MH 6 -hPR0, whereas no binding was observed on DNA beads lacking MH 6 -hPR0 (compare lanes 6 and 5), demonstrating that dTAF II 110 does not stably bind to DNA on its own. In contrast, control beads lacking DNA fragments, which did not contain bound PR after washing (data not shown), did not bind dTAF II 110 (lanes 4 and 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Fig. 1A, 35 S-labeled dTAF II 110 was retained on beads containing DNA-bound MH 6 -hPR0, whereas no binding was observed on DNA beads lacking MH 6 -hPR0 (compare lanes 6 and 5), demonstrating that dTAF II 110 does not stably bind to DNA on its own. In contrast, control beads lacking DNA fragments, which did not contain bound PR after washing (data not shown), did not bind dTAF II 110 (lanes 4 and 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In contrast, control beads lacking DNA fragments, which did not contain bound PR after washing (data not shown), did not bind dTAF II 110 (lanes 4 and 3). To explore the specificity of the interaction, we tested whether DNA-bound MH 6 -hPR0 would interact under the same conditions with 35 S-labeled luciferase (Fig. 1B) or human TFIIB (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Type I antiprogestins (13α-methyl substituted 19-nor-steroids) represented by onapristone (46), have been shown to prevent the association of the hPR to DNA. Type II antagonists (13β-methyl 19-nor-steroids) represented by RU-486 or ZK-98734 (lilopristone), appeared to promote stable binding of the receptor to DNA (29, 47,48) in in vitro binding studies. Based on these findings, it was proposed that the type I compounds may hamper hPR-mediated transactivation by preventing binding of hPR to progesterone response elements (PRE), whereas the type II compounds may act at steps downstream of DNA binding by preventing interaction with coactivators and/or enhancing interaction with corepressors (29, 44,49).…”
Section: Different Types Of Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%