2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02847.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory T-Cell Counter-Regulation by Innate Immunity Is a Barrier to Transplantation Tolerance

Abstract: Innate immune signals foster adaptive immunity through activation of antigen-presenting cells. Recent in vitro evidence suggests that innate signaling may also contribute to immunity by countering the effects of regulatory T cells (T-regs), counter-regulation. We present in vivo evidence using a transgenic skin allograft model that the function of T-regs is lost in the setting of acute skin transplantation but remains intact when grafts were transplanted 1 month prior to allow surgery-induced inflammation to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the expression of Foxp3 is unstable and will be down-regulated in an IL-6-rich, Th17-promoting environment. When such Treg ‘deprogramming’ occurs, Tregs fail to exert their original immunoinhibitory role [ 20 , 21 ] and may convert into competent Foxp3- effector T cells, which up-regulate the RORγt expression [ 11 ]. Inflammation-dampening strategies, particularly manipulating the inflammation occurring in the graft and draining lymph nodes, may guide the host immunity from an adverse effect toward tissue-protective phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the expression of Foxp3 is unstable and will be down-regulated in an IL-6-rich, Th17-promoting environment. When such Treg ‘deprogramming’ occurs, Tregs fail to exert their original immunoinhibitory role [ 20 , 21 ] and may convert into competent Foxp3- effector T cells, which up-regulate the RORγt expression [ 11 ]. Inflammation-dampening strategies, particularly manipulating the inflammation occurring in the graft and draining lymph nodes, may guide the host immunity from an adverse effect toward tissue-protective phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deletion of activated T cells is necessary, but not sufficient, for induction of transplantation tolerance, since T cells from tolerant recipients are able to reject allografts adoptively transferred into new recipients within 3 weeks after transplantation (48). On the other hand, antigen-specific Tregs do not seem to participate during the early phase of tolerance induction (49), as it takes 3 weeks for Tregs to fully develop in the periphery of tolerant recipients (50,51). These observations suggest that additional mechanisms of early immune regulation must exist that protect the allograft from being acutely rejected by day 10 after transplant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current translational transplant studies are focused upon the delivery of T-regs with direct allospecificity ( 97 , 99 , 108 112 ), partly because these can be generated more readily than indirect pathway T-regs. These are likely to be most effective in preventing early acute rejection, albeit the strong pro-inflammatory environment immediately after transplantation may favor deleterious trans-differentiation of the administered T-regs to T effector status ( 113 ). Control of acute rejection is not a major clinical problem, and while early administration of direct pathway T-regs may have long-lasting consequences ( 114 ), based on the above consideration of expression of target epitope at late time points, one would predict that chronic rejection will be better controlled by iT-regs with indirect allospecificity.…”
Section: Targeting Late T Cell Alloresponses To Prevent Progression Omentioning
confidence: 99%