Rehabilitación protésica implanto-soportada previo protocolo de terapia de oxígeno hiperbárico, posterior a resección de carcinoma epidermoide de piso de boca y radioterapia. Reporte clínico

Martínez, Mathias; Rodríguez, Rafael Ruiz; Noriega, II Juan Carlos López

doi:10.1016/s1870-199x(14)72072-5

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The characteristics of the 19 studies included are described in Tables 1 and 2. The geographic areas of the studies were: Austria [17,18], China [19], Germany [2,4,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26], Italy [7,27,28], Japan [29], Spain [30,31]and Switzerland [32]. All 19 included studies are non-randomized clinical trials.…”

Section: Study Selection Process and Study Featuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies have shown that restoring teeth is one of the three most important things for them, for both the masticatory functionality and aesthetic appearance, with a signi cant impact on quality of life [3]. Di culties in these rehabilitations are derived from anatomical variations, incompatibilities of the ap used, and in a greater way, from hard and soft tissues' status after concomitant RT, which results in a high percentage of implant loss [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Survival of osseointegrated implants in head and neck cancer patients submitted to multimodal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Camolesi,

Veronese,

Celestino

et al. 2023

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: to investigate the survival rate in implants placement in irradiated and non-irradiated bone in patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. We focused on the consequences of the main complications, such as osteoradionecrosis, peri-implantitis.Methods: An electronic search conducted by PRISMA protocol was performed. Full texts were carefully assessed, and data were assimilated into a tabular form for discussion and consensus among the expert panel. The quality assessment and the risk of bias are veri ed by Joanna Briggs Institute checklist (JBI) and The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool.Results: A total of 452 records were identi ed in the based on our PICOs strategy and after screening, 19 articles were included in the descriptive analysis of the review. Totaling 473 implants placed in irradiated and non-irradiated bone, and 31.6 % of the patients were over 60 years of age. 57.9%) performed implant placement in a period of 12 months or more after the ending of radiotherapy. Only 5 studies had a follow-up period longer than 5 years after implant placement, of which three were used for the meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis of 5-year survival rate analysis of implants in irradiated bone was assessed; a random effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 93.13% (95% CI: 87.20 -99.06; p<0.001), and in the 5-year survival rate analysis of implants in non-irradiated bone was analysed, a xed effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 98.52% survival (95% CI: 97.56-99.48, p<0.001). Conclusions: Survival rates of implants placed in irradiated bone is clinically satisfactory after a follow-up of 5 years, with a fewer percentage than in implants placed in non-irradiated bone after metanalyses performed.

show abstract

Section: Study Selection Process and Study Featuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survival of osseointegrated implants in head and neck cancer patients submitted to multimodal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Camolesi,

Veronese,

Celestino

et al. 2023

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Survival of osseointegrated implants in head and neck cancer patients submitted to multimodal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Camolesi,

Veronese,

Celestino

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: to investigate the survival rate in implants placement in irradiated and non-irradiated bone in patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. We focused on the consequences of the main complications, such as osteoradionecrosis, peri-implantitis. Methods: An electronic search conducted by PRISMA protocol was performed. Full texts were carefully assessed, and data were assimilated into a tabular form for discussion and consensus among the expert panel. The quality assessment and the risk of bias are verified by Joanna Briggs Institute checklist (JBI) and The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool. Results: A total of 452 records were identified in the based on our PICOs strategy and after screening, 19 articles were included in the descriptive analysis of the review. Totaling 473 implants placed in irradiated and non-irradiated bone, and 31.6 % of the patients were over 60 years of age. 57.9%) performed implant placement in a period of 12 months or more after the ending of radiotherapy. Only 5 studies had a follow-up period longer than 5 years after implant placement, of which three were used for the meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis of 5-year survival rate analysis of implants in irradiated bone was assessed; a random effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 93.13% (95% CI: 87.20 - 99.06; p<0.001), and in the 5-year survival rate analysis of implants in non-irradiated bone was analysed, a fixed effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 98.52% survival (95% CI: 97.56-99.48, p<0.001). Conclusions: Survival rates of implants placed in irradiated bone is clinically satisfactory after a follow-up of 5 years, with a fewer percentage than in implants placed in non-irradiated bone after metanalyses performed.

show abstract

Rehabilitación protésica implanto-soportada previo protocolo de terapia de oxígeno hiperbárico, posterior a resección de carcinoma epidermoide de piso de boca y radioterapia. Reporte clínico

Cited by 2 publications

References 10 publications

Survival of osseointegrated implants in head and neck cancer patients submitted to multimodal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Survival of osseointegrated implants in head and neck cancer patients submitted to multimodal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Survival of osseointegrated implants in head and neck cancer patients submitted to multimodal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About