The Routledge Companion to Rehabilitative Work in Criminal Justice 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9781315102832-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehabilitation and re-entry in Scandinavia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Penal voluntary organizations have also taken on greater responsibility in reentry work (Koffeld-Hamidane et al, 2023). Discrepancies between aims and practices related to resettlement have been highlighted by practitioners and researchers (Johnsen and Fridhov, 2019;Koffeld-Hamidane et al, 2023;Todd-Kvam and Ugelvik, 2019). Prison staff report fewer opportunities to engage in reentry work, while probation caseworkers are concerned about the impact of the recent changes on rehabilitation and desistance (Actis, 2020;Koffeld-Hamidane et al, 2023;Todd-Kvam, 2020), and researchers point out how the increasing risk focus has re-shaped the Norwegian penal field (Todd-Kvam, forthcoming).…”
Section: Resettlement Practice In Norwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penal voluntary organizations have also taken on greater responsibility in reentry work (Koffeld-Hamidane et al, 2023). Discrepancies between aims and practices related to resettlement have been highlighted by practitioners and researchers (Johnsen and Fridhov, 2019;Koffeld-Hamidane et al, 2023;Todd-Kvam and Ugelvik, 2019). Prison staff report fewer opportunities to engage in reentry work, while probation caseworkers are concerned about the impact of the recent changes on rehabilitation and desistance (Actis, 2020;Koffeld-Hamidane et al, 2023;Todd-Kvam, 2020), and researchers point out how the increasing risk focus has re-shaped the Norwegian penal field (Todd-Kvam, forthcoming).…”
Section: Resettlement Practice In Norwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, in many countries, for most prisoners, the end of imprisonment is not the end of state sanction; licence conditions and community supervision are usually imposed post-release, meaning that freedom is not total (McNeill, 2019a(McNeill, , 2019bTodd-Kvam and Ugelvik, 2019). Nevertheless, for decades scholars have suggested that more should be done to mark the exit from prison, and indeed the end of punishment (Braithwaite and Mugford, 1994;Maruna, 2011;Travis, 2000).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, though, release itself is rarely described in scholarly prisons literature. While there is an array of literature on resettlement and reintegration (Maruna and Immarigeon, 2004;Todd-Kvam and Ugelvik, 2019;Western, 2018), the actual moment of release is seldom mentioned. Travis et al (2001: 18) reference the 'small but significant details' which shape the day of release (such as the time of day one is allowed to walk out the gate, or the point at which one is reunited with family and how this happens) but acknowledge that there has been very little empirical research into the release event specifically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another caseworker described needing to get practicalities sorted to avoid a feeling of failure and create a sense of achievement, particularly for those who may have tried and failed before. Johnsen and Fridhov (2019) and Todd-Kvam and Ugelvik (2019) have though described how coordinating all the relevant services to enable a smooth reintegration process remains a challenge. As one caseworker describes,So what I often find difficult, is that they can get out of prison and they have a desire to change their lives, they have a desire to of course not go to prison again, but also to start work.…”
Section: Practice Descriptions – Relationships Capital and Practical ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research that does address probation tends, like much penal exceptionalism research, to take a systemic, top-down perspective. Ploeg and Sandlie (2011), Johnsen and Fridhov (2019), and Todd-Kvam and Ugelvik (2019) take this perspective in providing systemic accounts of how probation should work in the eyes of policy makers, while identifying challenges to delivery of these policy goals. Similarly, Ploeg (2017) describes how central features of the Norwegian Correctional Service apply to probation, highlighting discretionary authority as a key element of community sanctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%