2003
DOI: 10.1127/lr/15/2003/211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehabitation of an impounded section of the Danube in Vienna (Austria) - evaluation of inshore structures and habitat diversity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marine ecologists have made suggestions about which design features of engineered structures will affect their ecological value (Table 1), as well as principles that might be used to manage shore zones taking ecological services into account (Table 2). There have been a few attempts to assess the ecological value of different kinds of structures in freshwater shore zones as well (Fladung 2002;Scholten 2002;Chovanec et al 2005;Kleinwächtler et al 2005;Scholten et al 2005). …”
Section: Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Marine ecologists have made suggestions about which design features of engineered structures will affect their ecological value (Table 1), as well as principles that might be used to manage shore zones taking ecological services into account (Table 2). There have been a few attempts to assess the ecological value of different kinds of structures in freshwater shore zones as well (Fladung 2002;Scholten 2002;Chovanec et al 2005;Kleinwächtler et al 2005;Scholten et al 2005). …”
Section: Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 must have had very large ecological effects, even though these effects seem not to have been quantified. Some restoration projects are specifically designed to add back some of this shoreline complexity to enhance biodiversity (Hein et al 2004;Chovanec et al 2005). …”
Section: Changes To the Hydrological Regimementioning
confidence: 99%