2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehydration characteristics of milk protein concentrate powders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
105
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
14
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In present study, we just determined the θ at 5 s to distinguish the wettability differences of the samples. It was seen from Table 3 that θ of raw sample was about 42°, which was more than the value of milk protein concentrate (MPC 35, lower than 30°) (Crowley et al, 2015) but lower than the value of skimmed milk powder (ca. 60°) (Ji et al, 2016).…”
Section: Wetting Behaviormentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In present study, we just determined the θ at 5 s to distinguish the wettability differences of the samples. It was seen from Table 3 that θ of raw sample was about 42°, which was more than the value of milk protein concentrate (MPC 35, lower than 30°) (Crowley et al, 2015) but lower than the value of skimmed milk powder (ca. 60°) (Ji et al, 2016).…”
Section: Wetting Behaviormentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Milk powder was added to 300 mL of DI water to obtain 1.5% (w/v) suspension (Crowley et al, 2015). For dynamic analysis of conductivity over 120 min, milk suspensions were stirred at 25 °C with 2025 rpm.…”
Section: Measurements Of Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, their high protein contents, being derived mainly from caseins, were mainly responsible for the poor wettability of these powders. Crowley et al (2015) showed how composition influenced the contact angle of milk protein concentrate powders, with higher protein (lower lactose) content resulting in higher contact angles. The low apparent density and relatively small particle size of the MPI powder may also contribute to its poor wettability.…”
Section: Wettability and Effect Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the contact angle measurement test is used in this study to measure "surface hydrophobicity", rather than the traditional idea of wettability (Crowley, 2015). Since wettability and sinkability are closely tied in the IDF Wettability method, this method is used to relate to the contact angle method for wettability as well as to provide information on wettability and sinkability.…”
Section: Rehydration Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%