2017
DOI: 10.5334/sta.555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reimagining SSR in Contexts of Security Pluralism

Abstract: Within the repertoire of international stabilization interventions, security sector reform (SSR) and other conventional efforts to strengthen security and governance institutions remain central. There is increasing recognition that the policies and practices operating under the rubric of SSR are blind to the empirical reality of security pluralism in most stabilization contexts. In these contexts, both security providers directly authorized by the state (police, army) and a multitude of other coercive actors e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on the network or nodal governance of security echoes these concerns. This approach acknowledges the (increasing) ' diversity of auspices and providers of security' (Shearing 2005: 58) and underlines the importance of taking the plurality and agency of these actors seriously (Johnston and Shearing 2003;Dupont et al 2007;Price and Warren 2017;Biaumet 2017). As such, not only does it provide for a widening of the analysis to non-state actors, but it also allows for a cross-examination of the governance of the security network and the relations between all security actors.…”
Section: Governing Security In Tenkodogomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on the network or nodal governance of security echoes these concerns. This approach acknowledges the (increasing) ' diversity of auspices and providers of security' (Shearing 2005: 58) and underlines the importance of taking the plurality and agency of these actors seriously (Johnston and Shearing 2003;Dupont et al 2007;Price and Warren 2017;Biaumet 2017). As such, not only does it provide for a widening of the analysis to non-state actors, but it also allows for a cross-examination of the governance of the security network and the relations between all security actors.…”
Section: Governing Security In Tenkodogomentioning
confidence: 99%