2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinfection after resection and revascularization of infected infrarenal abdominal aortic grafts

Abstract: Revascularization after excision of infected abdominal aortic grafts can be done with acceptable in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Reinfection is problematic, regardless of revascularization conduit, and is associated with limb loss and death. New and aggressive local anti-infective strategies are warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
23
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the surgical technique used, reinfection affects up to 20% of patients treated for graft infection. 9 We postulate that antibiotic beads are adjunctive and should not replace standard treatment of infected abdominal vascular grafts. Antibiotic-laden cement beads deliver high local concentrations without systemic drug toxicities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Regardless of the surgical technique used, reinfection affects up to 20% of patients treated for graft infection. 9 We postulate that antibiotic beads are adjunctive and should not replace standard treatment of infected abdominal vascular grafts. Antibiotic-laden cement beads deliver high local concentrations without systemic drug toxicities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Despite these measures, 20% of patients with abdominal graft infection will have recurrent infection. [7][8][9] Diffusion of a high-concentration antibiotic into the infected field from implanted beads may be a useful adjunct to prevent graft reinfection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations