2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcement of binder adhesion for nickel-rich layered oxide in lithium-ion batteries using perfluorinated molecular surface modification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ni-rich material undergoes a significant volume change while charging, and volume shrinkage occurs after 4.0 V vs. Li/Li + , indicating a significant volume change. [3,27,36,37] During the discharging, the volume is secured as lithium re-enters, and the deterioration of the electrode binding force is mitigated. However, the physcial stress by charge process still remain after the discharging process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Ni-rich material undergoes a significant volume change while charging, and volume shrinkage occurs after 4.0 V vs. Li/Li + , indicating a significant volume change. [3,27,36,37] During the discharging, the volume is secured as lithium re-enters, and the deterioration of the electrode binding force is mitigated. However, the physcial stress by charge process still remain after the discharging process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replacing Co with Ni in LiCoO 2 results in a higher energy density and lower cost. [3][4][5] The use of metal ions other than Co, such as Ni, Mn, and Al, is being actively pursued to further increase the energy density and stability of the batteries. Esepcially, the recent commerialization of Ni-rich materials as cathode active materials for LIBs is a significant step towards improving the energy density and competitiveness of LIBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, interfacial accessibility is not a serious concern in common electrochemical cells containing liquid electrolytes, as the liquid easily penetrates a porous electrode comprising active materials, a conducting agent, and a binder in the case of LIBs. 22,23 The mechanism of typical liquid LIB interfacial resistance is centered on the passivation film and proceeds by electrochemical decomposition of the electrolyte rather than physical interfacial resistance. Conversely, it is difficult to establish a wide ionictransport interface where the SE and active materials are in contact with ASSBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASSBs have a more complicated interfacial resistance among the components than ordinary LIBs. In general, interfacial accessibility is not a serious concern in common electrochemical cells containing liquid electrolytes, as the liquid easily penetrates a porous electrode comprising active materials, a conducting agent, and a binder in the case of LIBs 22,23 . The mechanism of typical liquid LIB interfacial resistance is centered on the passivation film and proceeds by electrochemical decomposition of the electrolyte rather than physical interfacial resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%