2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinsurance games with two reinsurers: Tree versus chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, instead of a finite or an infinite planning horizon, we assume that the insured's planning horizon τ is random and exogenously given. Several recent papers (see Cao et al, 2022 and followups) on optimal (re)insurance problems also consider a random horizon; in particular, footnote 18 in Cao et al (2023a) discusses in detail the mathematical and economic justifications for the choice of a random horizon. 12 Because we assumed that the insured adopts a homogeneous barrier strategy in reporting, it is natural to assume that the random horizon τ follows a geometric distribution, which is the only memoryless discrete distribution.…”
Section: Insured's Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, instead of a finite or an infinite planning horizon, we assume that the insured's planning horizon τ is random and exogenously given. Several recent papers (see Cao et al, 2022 and followups) on optimal (re)insurance problems also consider a random horizon; in particular, footnote 18 in Cao et al (2023a) discusses in detail the mathematical and economic justifications for the choice of a random horizon. 12 Because we assumed that the insured adopts a homogeneous barrier strategy in reporting, it is natural to assume that the random horizon τ follows a geometric distribution, which is the only memoryless discrete distribution.…”
Section: Insured's Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be more concrete, the joint effect of (b 1 , d 1 ) and (b 2 , d 2 ) on J i is due to the fact that there is a strictly positive probability that the insured will move from one rate class to another. Consequently, the insured plays against herself in a noncooperative Nash game; please see Remark 3.1 in Cao et al (2023a) for a detailed discussion on this game feature and Björk et al (2014) and ( 2017) for standard references on such a game-theoretical approach.…”
Section: Insured's Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%