2003
DOI: 10.1075/cilt.233.05wal
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinterpreting transparency in nasal harmony

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the analysis of nasal harmony, once the domain of nasalization is delimited and the segments are classified as underspecified for nasality, transparent, and/or opaque, the major challenge is to define the trigger and the direction of spreading, as Walker recognizes for Tuyuca: "because nasality spreads to all nasalizable segments in a nasal morpheme, it is impossible to unambiguously pinpoint the segment from which spreading originates" (Walker 2003).…”
Section: Nasal Harmonymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the analysis of nasal harmony, once the domain of nasalization is delimited and the segments are classified as underspecified for nasality, transparent, and/or opaque, the major challenge is to define the trigger and the direction of spreading, as Walker recognizes for Tuyuca: "because nasality spreads to all nasalizable segments in a nasal morpheme, it is impossible to unambiguously pinpoint the segment from which spreading originates" (Walker 2003).…”
Section: Nasal Harmonymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the Emerillon data also challenge the question of transparency. Walker's (2003) scale, ranking segments according to their compatibility with nasalization, predicts that (i) if a segment blocks nasalization, all segments less compatible with nasality will also block it, and (ii) if a segment is permeable (nasalized or transparent), all segments more compatible by the nasalization hierarchy will also be permeable. 6Vowels > Glides > Liquids > Fricatives > Obstruent stops Yet the hierarchy does not predict, within the permeable segments, which will be targets and which will be transparents.…”
Section: Nasal Harmonymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is debated whether the third type of relationship a segment can have with nasal harmony, namely transparency, should be explained by the nasalized segment hierarchy, given that the class of transparent segments varies from language to language, sometimes including obstruents and other times including sonorants. It is also debated whether transparent segments are truly transparent phonologically or whether their lack of nasalization in a nasal harmony environment is a phonetic implementation detail (see further discussion in [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]). As a result of these open questions, only targets and blockers will be included for the remainder of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Rodrigues' proposal, voiceless consonants block nasality spreading, so a word such as [kuˈkũə̯], *[kũˈkũə̯], 'to clear one's throat' will come from an underlying form /kokod/, in which the voiced consonant nasalizes and subsequently spreads its nasality leftwards up until the voiceless consonant that stops further leftward spreading. 3 Finally, approaches such as Walker (2003) take nasal harmony to be bidirectional for languages such as Tuyuca, and under this style of analysis, nasalization would spread from the stressed vowel to every other segment in both directions, except when halted by voiceless consonants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%