2012
DOI: 10.5849/njaf.11-041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reintroduction of American Chestnut (Castanea dentata) on Reclaimed Mine Sites in Ohio: Microsite Factors Controlling Establishment Success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We had expected to see an exponentially decreasing curve for measures of species density and richness with increasing distance from the forest edge (Harper et al 2005). This reversed pattern of woody seedling survival has been observed at this site with introduced seedlings (Gilland & McCarthy 2012) and is the subject of ongoing research to attempt to elucidate the mechanism driving the pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We had expected to see an exponentially decreasing curve for measures of species density and richness with increasing distance from the forest edge (Harper et al 2005). This reversed pattern of woody seedling survival has been observed at this site with introduced seedlings (Gilland & McCarthy 2012) and is the subject of ongoing research to attempt to elucidate the mechanism driving the pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Gilland and McCarthy (2012) found that chestnut seedlings planted near the edge of existing forest (within about 16 feet) showed significantly lower growth and survival than seedlings planted away from the forest edge (75 to 150 feet). They also found that chestnuts fared better when some ground cover was present, and that seedlings survived better when planted on the sides of end-dumped FRA piles than when planted on the tops of the piles.…”
Section: Biotic and Abiotic Considerations For Establishing Chestnutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It not only changes the original topography but also exhibits a high bulk density (1.5~1.9 g cm -3 ) that is not suitable for plant growth (Song & Bai, 2000). The current research on the dumps is mostly focused on the properties of dumped materials (Koner & Chakravarty, 2015;Rubinos, Spagnoli, & Barral, 2015;Wang, Li et al, 2017), the spatial variability of dumped materials (Wang, Zhang, Bai, & Guo, 2015;Wang, Lu et al, 2018), and revegetation (Gilland & McCarthy, 2012;Larkin et al, 2008). However, the effects of different compaction degrees on surface runoff and the changes in the volumetric water content of a soil profile in a coal mine dump are less studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%