2016
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reissner–Mindlin shell implementation and energy conserving isogeometric multi‐patch coupling

Abstract: SUMMARYA shear-flexible isogeometric Reissner-Mindlin shell formulation using NURBS basis functions is introduced, which is used for the demonstration of a coupling approach for multiple non-conforming patches. The six degrees of freedom formulation uses the exact surface normal vectors and curvature. The shell formulation is implemented in an isogeometric analysis framework for computation of structures composed of multiple geometric entities. To enable local model refinement as well as non-matching domains c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, IGA offers a rigorous framework for simulating the mechanics of masonry and the equilibrium state of the surface, which is a distinct advantage over the network-based TNA methods. Simulation of shell structures with IGA has been widely investigated to calculate the inner stress state of shells under outer loads [22][23][24]. Cazzani et al applied a NURBS based isogeometric beam model to simulate the historical masonry arches [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, IGA offers a rigorous framework for simulating the mechanics of masonry and the equilibrium state of the surface, which is a distinct advantage over the network-based TNA methods. Simulation of shell structures with IGA has been widely investigated to calculate the inner stress state of shells under outer loads [22][23][24]. Cazzani et al applied a NURBS based isogeometric beam model to simulate the historical masonry arches [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of arbitrary non-conforming interfaces, the coupling conditions are imposed in a weak sense. There are different approaches that can be employed; namely penalty methods [34][35][36], mortar methods [34,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43], and Nitsche methods [44][45][46][47][48]. Because stiffened structures are built with thin shells, we seek to consider isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shell formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the superior modeling capabilities of trimming, engineering‐related geometric models often contain multiple trimmed objects that need to be consolidated as a single model. To enforce coupling constraints between shell patches, a number of approaches have been proposed, for example, penalty‐type methods, Nitsche‐type methods, as well as other methods, cf the works of Coox et al and Sommerwerk et al, to name only a few. Compared to penalty‐type methods, the variationally consistent Nitsche method can preserve optimal convergence rates and well‐conditioned discrete equations and thus received considerable attention in the community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%