2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reject inference in consumer credit scoring with nonignorable missing data

Abstract: We generalize an empirical likelihood approach to missing data to the case of consumer credit scoring and provide a Hausman test for nonignorability of the missings. An application to recent consumer credit data shows that our model yields parameter estimates which are significantly different (both statistically and economically) from the case where customers who were refused credit are ignored.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can accommodate binary or ordered dependent variables and generate the probability of default under the Basel Accord. Hence, Bücker et al (2013) used an improved logit model to enhance the performance of consumer credit scoring. Zeng and Zhao (2014) presented a twophase augmentation model integrated with weighted logistic regression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can accommodate binary or ordered dependent variables and generate the probability of default under the Basel Accord. Hence, Bücker et al (2013) used an improved logit model to enhance the performance of consumer credit scoring. Zeng and Zhao (2014) presented a twophase augmentation model integrated with weighted logistic regression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, Bücker et al . () used an improved logit model to enhance the performance of consumer credit scoring. Zeng and Zhao () presented a two‐phase augmentation model integrated with weighted logistic regression.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example if a given application has a probability of being rejected of 0.80, then all similar applications would be weighted up 1/(1 − 0.8) = 5 times [2]. None of the empirical research using augmentation shows significant improvements in either correcting the selection bias or improving model performance, see [2,4,5,7,10,14,49]. The augmentation technique assumes that the default probability is independent of whether the loan is accepted or rejected [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, developing a scorecard that ignored "rejects" is not applicable to the total population, and forecasting for all applicants will not be accurate and realistic (Siddiqi, 2012). While a stream of literature focuses on "reject inference techniques" that address this problem (Jacobson and Roszbach, 2003;Crook and Banasik, 2004;Bücker et al, 2013), including certain types of loans that should not be in the development sample, also deteriorates the model, especially for behavior scorecards. Including loans for special customers such as staff and VIPs or lost/stolen cards, deceased customers and restructured payment plans in the observed data set will change the true characteristics that predict the target (Siddiqi, 2012).…”
Section: Details Of Scoring Typementioning
confidence: 99%