2016
DOI: 10.1080/14664208.2016.1220279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rejecting Babel: examining multilingualism without citizenship in the U.S. postnational scenario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we return attention to the monolingual ideological structures that inform our theoretical framing: If a school is institutionally structured to exclude bilingual students and their linguistic resources, it is little surprising that teachers routinely encounter situations where they must confront deficit‐oriented mentalities (De Costa, 2020; Gándara & Hopkins, 2010). It follows that students exposed to this environment learn that only English and those who speak it should receive legitimacy in public spaces, with tangible consequences for upholding neo‐nationalist discourses (Barros, 2017; McIntosh, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we return attention to the monolingual ideological structures that inform our theoretical framing: If a school is institutionally structured to exclude bilingual students and their linguistic resources, it is little surprising that teachers routinely encounter situations where they must confront deficit‐oriented mentalities (De Costa, 2020; Gándara & Hopkins, 2010). It follows that students exposed to this environment learn that only English and those who speak it should receive legitimacy in public spaces, with tangible consequences for upholding neo‐nationalist discourses (Barros, 2017; McIntosh, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, instructional practices informed by monolingual ideologies exacerbate the already prevalent racism faced by PK‐12 students, sending messages about who “belongs”—or not—in classrooms, broader public spaces, or even the nation itself (De Costa, 2020; Rosa, 2018; Staehr Fenner, 2013). Given the historical ties between nationalism and language education, such conceptualizations of linguistic belonging versus otherizing link to neo‐national ideologies, such as presupposing monolingualism as an indicator of citizenship (Barros, 2017) and implications of “dis‐citizenship” for minoritized language speakers (Wodak, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Classroom Language Ideologies As Neo‐...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly necessary as U.S. classrooms are increasingly characterized by linguistic diversity, although the majority of the teaching force identifies as monolingual, White, and middle class (Boser, 2014; Villegas & Lucas, 2001). While there are a variety of pedagogical approaches to meeting the needs of linguistically diverse learners in education, historically, these approaches are often grounded in deficit orientations toward language variation (Barros, 2017; Blake & Cutler, 2003; Cross, DeVaney, & Jones, 2001; Spring, 2016; Wolfram, 1998). As linguistically diverse learners continue to confront inequitable language policies and practices—from English-only to *SE-only — this study draws from the fields of multilingualism and multidialecticism to explore how literacy and teacher education can disrupt the overlapping educational, linguistic, and racialized hierarchies perpetuated through the *SE myth.…”
Section: Background: From English-only To *Se-onlymentioning
confidence: 99%