2018
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30293-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relapse of Wilms' tumour and detection methods: a retrospective analysis of the 2001 Renal Tumour Study Group–International Society of Paediatric Oncology Wilms' tumour protocol database

Abstract: Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity, the European Expert Paediatric Oncology Reference Network for Diagnostics and Treatment, The Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation, Cancer Research UK, the UK National Cancer Research Network and Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group, Société Française des Cancers de l'Enfant and Association Leon Berard Enfant Cancéreux and Enfant et Santé, Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie and Deutsche Krebshilfe, Grupo Cooperativo Brasileiro para o Tratament… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Additionally, median follow-up in this series is three years, and continuous surveillance is needed to completely evaluate the risks of the procedure, although recurrences mainly occur in the first two years. 25 The inherent biases of a retrospective study are one of the limitations of this paper. In particular, there was a substantial amount of missing information, such as the total number of WT at each center during the study period and postoperative care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…5 Additionally, median follow-up in this series is three years, and continuous surveillance is needed to completely evaluate the risks of the procedure, although recurrences mainly occur in the first two years. 25 The inherent biases of a retrospective study are one of the limitations of this paper. In particular, there was a substantial amount of missing information, such as the total number of WT at each center during the study period and postoperative care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[21][22][23] The current study is limited by its retrospective design. [21][22][23] The current study is limited by its retrospective design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies assessing the value of routine imaging in other soft-tissue and bone sarcomas have shown contradictory results, and this illustrates the necessity for tumorspecific studies assessing the value of surveillance imaging because its value is dependent on tumor-specific factors (eg, tumor biology and chance of survival after relapse). [21][22][23] The current study is limited by its retrospective design. We tried to limit this bias by using a standardized case report form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was about 17.8% in the series of Aoba et al [7]. In 80% of cases relapses occur within 2 years after the first diagnosis [8]. The mean time to relapse was 4.38 months in our series.…”
Section: Comments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 39%
“…The prognosis is poor as the stage rises. For Brok J et al [8] stage III and V are considered as risk factors. The surgical stage was decisive in the occurrence of recurrences (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Tumor Surgical Stagementioning
confidence: 99%