2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02003.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relapses vs. reactions in multibacillary leprosy: proposal of new relapse criteria

Abstract: Summaryobjectives To compare a new scoring system for multibacillary (MB) leprosy relapses, which combines time factor, risk factors and clinical presentation at relapse, to WHO criteria. results The new scoring system that combines time factor, risk factors and clinical presentation at relapse had a higher sensitivity in MFP-confirmed relapses than the WHO-criteria (95% vs. 65%, P < 0.01). The sensitivity of the scoring system was also significantly higher than the WHO criteria in the 57 cases of MB-relapses … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical signs, which are called infl ammatory episodes, may affect both paucibacillary and multibacillary cases, and when they appear following chemotherapy, they may be confounded with cases of recurrence. 3,9,11,20 According to Ximenes et al (2007) 21 and Shetty et al (2005), 18 patients who present reactional episodes are more likely to be treated as cases of recurrence. This indicates that there is a need for greater attention to the differential diagnosis between these two conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical signs, which are called infl ammatory episodes, may affect both paucibacillary and multibacillary cases, and when they appear following chemotherapy, they may be confounded with cases of recurrence. 3,9,11,20 According to Ximenes et al (2007) 21 and Shetty et al (2005), 18 patients who present reactional episodes are more likely to be treated as cases of recurrence. This indicates that there is a need for greater attention to the differential diagnosis between these two conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data show that development of DR isolates of M. leprae is contributing to leprosy relapse in Brazil but that the following are alternative causes: (i) bacterial persistence, (ii) immunosuppression of the host, (iii) pregnancy, (iv) the presence of advanced leprosy, (v) reinfection, and (vi) factors associated with failures in operational health care, such as late diagnosis, inadequate or irregular treatment of the disease, and misclassification of earlier disease (11,18,19,20). We admit, however, that a limitation of this study is the use of PCR sequencing for SNP detection, with limitations regarding the detection of eventual minor mutant populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For good-quality data on relapse rates, in addition to laboratory technology, uniformity of clinical criteria relapse diagnosis is important and needs to be standardized within and among countries. Although it not so difficult to diagnose leprosy relapse during the late MB disease form, recognition of relapse is not so easy during early disease, especially in the borderline spectrum cases of disease and under field conditions (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As new cases are considered a major indicator of the maintenance of disease transmission (Rinaldi, 2005), this shows that there is still a need for better measures to control leprosy (WHO, 2008). Relapsed cases could be a new source of disease transmission, but differentiating the diagnoses of disease relapse and of reactional state poses some difficulties in the field, contributing to continuing disease transmission in some situations (Linder et al, 2008;Shetty et al, 2005) or overdiagnosis of relapse in others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%