2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.95.042321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between quantum fluctuations and the performance enhancement of quantum annealing in a nonstoquastic Hamiltonian

Abstract: We study the relation between quantum fluctuations and the significant enhancement of the performance of quantum annealing in a mean-field Hamiltonian. First-order quantum phase transitions were shown to be reduced to second order by antiferromagnetic transverse interactions in a mean-field-type many-body-interacting Ising spin system in a transverse field, which means an exponential speedup of quantum annealing by adiabatic quantum computation. We investigate if and how quantum effects manifest themselves aro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter reduces the efficiency of adiabatic computations as the minimal gap ∆ closes exponentially as a function of n [42]. Several techniques are known to mitigate the detrimental effects of first-order QPTs in the quantum annealing of the p-spin model, such as non-stoquastic AQC [43,[51][52][53], inhomogeneous driving [44,54], or reverse annealing [29,45,[55][56][57]. We will not discuss these techniques here.…”
Section: Ii1 Ferromagnetic P-spin Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter reduces the efficiency of adiabatic computations as the minimal gap ∆ closes exponentially as a function of n [42]. Several techniques are known to mitigate the detrimental effects of first-order QPTs in the quantum annealing of the p-spin model, such as non-stoquastic AQC [43,[51][52][53], inhomogeneous driving [44,54], or reverse annealing [29,45,[55][56][57]. We will not discuss these techniques here.…”
Section: Ii1 Ferromagnetic P-spin Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For p > 3, the introduction of a non-stoquastic potential in the Hamiltonian is expected to turn the first-order QPT into a second-order QPT, where the gap closes polynomially as a function of the system size. This procedure does not hold for p = 3 [6]. We measure energies in units E and times in units E −1 , and we set Γ = E. With this choice, the minimal gap is equal to ∆ ≈ 0.47E.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are now investigating this problem, and the result will soon be published (Susa et al, 2016). One of the hints may lie in the sign of coefficients of the ground-state wave function in the standard computational basis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer is positive as far as the properties of phase transitions are concerned: Jörg et al (2010) used full quantum statistical-mechanical tools to reach the same conclusion as above. Quantum effects should be carefully taken into account if one wishes to fully understand the behavior of the energy gap for finite-size systems, as was done by Jörg et al (2010), and to describe more subtle properties of the system around the phase transition and within the ferromagnetic phase (Susa et al, 2016). However, the classical analysis is sufficient to predict the type of phase transitions in the thermodynamic limit.…”
Section: Quantum Annealing With Stoquastic Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%