1961
DOI: 10.1037/h0041249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation of early socialization experiences to aggression in middle childhood.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
2

Year Published

1964
1964
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms the generally accepted view that physical correction is inappropriate with teenagers. In contrast, the three studies of younger children all found more detrimental associations (effect sizes) for alternative punishment tactics than for physical punishment (Sears, 1961;Straus & Mouradian, 1998;Yarrow et al, 1968).…”
Section: Are the Links Between Adverse Child Outcomes And Cp Unique?mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This confirms the generally accepted view that physical correction is inappropriate with teenagers. In contrast, the three studies of younger children all found more detrimental associations (effect sizes) for alternative punishment tactics than for physical punishment (Sears, 1961;Straus & Mouradian, 1998;Yarrow et al, 1968).…”
Section: Are the Links Between Adverse Child Outcomes And Cp Unique?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to the problems caused by an overinclusive definition of CP, which could inflate effect sizes, Gershoff (2002) also based effect size estimates partly on cross-sectional correlations when longitudinal correlations were available (e.g., Sears, 1961;Straus, Sugarman, & Giles-Sims, 1997). An alternative strategy would have been to base effect sizes on the most valid associations available in a study or the ones most relevant to the debate about mild or moderate corporal punishment.…”
Section: Threats To the Validity Of The Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These subtypes include, but are not limited to, direct versus indirect (Buss 1961;Feshbach 1969), physical versus verbal (Buss 1961), active versus passive (Buss 1961), rational versus manipulative (Bjorkqvist, Osterman and Kaukiainen 1992), proactive versus reactive (Dodge 1991), antisocial versus prosocial (Sears 1961), annoyancemotivated versus incentive-motivated (Zillmann 1979), overt versus covert (Buss 1995), targeted versus targetless (Buss 1961), overt versus relational (Crick 1996;Crick and Grotpeter 1995), and relational versus social (Bjorkqvist 2001;Underwood, Galen and Paquette 2001).…”
Section: Some Dichotomous Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9, A.J.P.H. 15,20 ent to reinforce in the ways discussed earlier-permissively or restrictively, warmly or hostilely. While the primary focus of the present study was not to explore the internal instigators of action, some data relevant 'to this dimension were gathered during the course of the study.…”
Section: Attitudes and Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%