2010 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/bibmw.2010.5703810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relational database index choices for genome annotation data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus of the second group of integration studies, which we call biological integration studies, is the analysis of biological pathways and regulatory mechanisms among data obtained from different platforms, such as the relationship between gene expression and protein abundances, or the relationship between gene expression and copy number changes in patient tumor samples (Karpenko and Dai, 2010; van Wieringen et al. , 2012; Waters et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of the second group of integration studies, which we call biological integration studies, is the analysis of biological pathways and regulatory mechanisms among data obtained from different platforms, such as the relationship between gene expression and protein abundances, or the relationship between gene expression and copy number changes in patient tumor samples (Karpenko and Dai, 2010; van Wieringen et al. , 2012; Waters et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We rely on an additive regression model that accommodates potential nonlinear functional relationships to detect a typically small subset of the K cluster representatives as the regression predictors. By applying extensions of the spike-and-slab approaches (Brown et al, 1998;George and McCulloch, 1993;Karpenko and Dai, 2010), the additive regression model is y i indep ∼ N (η i , τ 2 ), where…”
Section: Models For Survival Outcomes and Gene Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exponential growth in the volume of genome annotation data has resulted in several recent genomics techniques employed in systems biology. To this effect, Karpenko & Dai [18] consider the conventional B-tree, R-tree, and no index options to effectively index annotation data in MySQL, Oracle, and PostgreSQL databases. Through experimentations, the R-tree solution is observed to outperform the B-tree based solution, and thus is a potential indexing structure for supporting and organizing genome annotation databases.…”
Section: A Work That Adopt the R-based Indexing Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, applications with high-dimensional data are in dire need of an efficient mechanism to organize their data [6], [7], [10], [15], [17], [24], [25], [31]- [33], [37], [39], [40], [42]. Nevertheless, the quest for processing high-dimensional data has resulted in a number of innovative indexing techniques which are found useful in many applications, like Geographical Information Systems (GIS), robotics, environmental protection, metric spaces, medical imaging, and geosciences, as they are geometrically suited for both point and spatial data [2], [3], [5]- [7], [9], [11], [12], [14], [16], [18], [24], [28], [30], [41], [43], [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%