2020
DOI: 10.1037/0000174-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relational spirituality in psychotherapy: Healing suffering and promoting growth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, the 4‐month assessment period was possibly not long enough in some cases to adequately test changes in God representations and certain theoretical orientations that place greater emphasis on long‐term treatment were not represented (e.g., psychodynamic). Beyond incorporating R/S in treatment, research on SIPs should also examine a more nuanced theoretical integration of change processes and goals with theoretically consistent clinical strategies (for a dynamically informed approach to addressing God representations, see Sandage et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the 4‐month assessment period was possibly not long enough in some cases to adequately test changes in God representations and certain theoretical orientations that place greater emphasis on long‐term treatment were not represented (e.g., psychodynamic). Beyond incorporating R/S in treatment, research on SIPs should also examine a more nuanced theoretical integration of change processes and goals with theoretically consistent clinical strategies (for a dynamically informed approach to addressing God representations, see Sandage et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary relational psychotherapy (CRP; Sandage et al, 2020) is a pantheoretical framework that transcends the diversity of ideas and practices within the psychoanalytic tradition, including distinctions between psychoanalytic and psychodynamic approaches. Huber et al (2013) characterized psychoanalytic approaches as “insight oriented” with a focus on restructuring internalized “maladaptive relationship representations,” whereas psychodynamic approaches focus on “symptom sustaining here‐and‐now conflicts” (p. 138).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research could enable further comparisons between the types of stressors and various ministry contexts by asking individuals to comment on or rate each of the categories. The relational themes in the qualitative findings also suggest future studies might benefit from engagement with research on relational trauma, which Herman (2015) defined as "violations of human connection" (p. 54), and can result in a susceptibility to frequent and intense dysregulation in response to interpersonal and spiritual conflicts (for an overview of relational trauma and spirituality, see Sandage et al, 2020). It is plausible that those with a history of relational trauma are at increased risk of ministry-related trauma that leads to problems with selfesteem regulation.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%