2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(99)01113-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship among the surface albedo, spectral reflectance of canopy, and evaporative fraction at grassland and paddy field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface albedo (α s = UPAR/DPAR) was found to be ∼0.065 at the station during the field campaign. This value is in agreement with the measurements of Higuchi et al [2000] who report values of surface albedo in the wavelength range of 490–900 nm ranging from ∼0.06–0.1 for a grassland in Japan on November 1997.…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The surface albedo (α s = UPAR/DPAR) was found to be ∼0.065 at the station during the field campaign. This value is in agreement with the measurements of Higuchi et al [2000] who report values of surface albedo in the wavelength range of 490–900 nm ranging from ∼0.06–0.1 for a grassland in Japan on November 1997.…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Since it is well known that EF is related to water availability provided by rainfall, particularly in the natural vegetation of semi-arid environments, vegetation growth and land cover [29,35,38,64], we used the RFE, SPOT-VGT NDVI and GlobCover classes to assess the consistency of EF estimation. In particular, average and relative standard deviation (RSD) maps of EF are computed from the 448 8-day EF maps and analyzed for the major land cover classes of the study area, thanks to GlobCover map.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Estimated Efmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaporative fraction (EF), which is defined as the ratio of latent heat flux to the available energy, plays an important role in interpreting the components of surface available energy, and improving the accuracy of field evapotranspiration (ET) estimation based on an energy balance algorithm [19][20][21][22]. It has been shown to vary in different behaviors and characteristics in response to the vegetation coverage [23], rainfall events [24], successions of wet and dry periods [25], vapor pressure deficit, and vegetation photosynthesis activity [26]. EF has been examined over several different vegetation land surfaces, such as grassland [27], rangeland [21], Vineyard [28], banana crop [29], and wheat and corn land [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rainfed rice fields in eastern India, EF was found to be 79-82% in different cultivars and seasons, with a gentle broad peak from the maximum tillering stage to the heading stage [35]. Higuchi et al [26] found that the value of EF in flooded rice fields was always close to one, due to the fact that soil is flooding in rice fields or the soil moisture is almost saturated. The variations of surface energy balance components and EF in the rice ecosystem are different from those in upland crops due to the flooding or saturated soil moisture conditions [34,36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%