1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90259-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between apparent accommodation and corneal multifocality in pseudophakic eyes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
56
3
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
56
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…So it depends on patient cooperation and understanding. Subjective methods were found to be more reliable for measuring apparent accommodation according to Langenbucher et al 16 Many previous researches confirmed that the amplitude of apparent accommodation is correlated with different factors including; depth of focus 17,18 , pupil diameter 4,19 , degree of corneal astigmatism 20 , corneal multifocality and aberrations 21,22 , and IOL axial forward movement. 23,24 Depth of focus is an intrinsic characteristic of all optical systems that was considered to be one of the most significant factors of apparent accommodation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So it depends on patient cooperation and understanding. Subjective methods were found to be more reliable for measuring apparent accommodation according to Langenbucher et al 16 Many previous researches confirmed that the amplitude of apparent accommodation is correlated with different factors including; depth of focus 17,18 , pupil diameter 4,19 , degree of corneal astigmatism 20 , corneal multifocality and aberrations 21,22 , and IOL axial forward movement. 23,24 Depth of focus is an intrinsic characteristic of all optical systems that was considered to be one of the most significant factors of apparent accommodation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is associated with pupil size (9) , myopic astigmatism (10) , longitudinal movement of the IOL (11) , and corneal multifocality (12) . Nevertheless, this technique revealed a marked acceptance in our studied group with higher rate of satisfaction and its result is consistent with other studies, including the same mean SE reported by some authors (13) who also demonstrated that the SE of -2.0 D provided intermediate and near vision in most cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 We measured the OS by applying the pharmacological method in which we calculated the difference in the ACD. 3,10,11,24,[30][31][32][33][34][35] Although this is an indirect method, it is well-accepted as it does not rely on patient compliance during the measurement procedure. 3 Even though these pharmacological stimuli are nonphysiological, they are reported to be useful to find out the maximum potential of the optic shift.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%